Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., C17-0814JLR. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180412e45 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . On April 10, 2018, Plaintiff Central Freight Lines, Inc. ("Central Freight") filed a motion to compel certain discovery from Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. ("Amazon"). (MTC (Dkt. #98).) The court admonishes Central Freight and its counsel for filing the motion in contravention of the court's scheduling order, which requires a party to request a conference with the court before moving for an order related to discovery. 1 (Sched. Order (D
More

ORDER

On April 10, 2018, Plaintiff Central Freight Lines, Inc. ("Central Freight") filed a motion to compel certain discovery from Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. ("Amazon"). (MTC (Dkt. #98).) The court admonishes Central Freight and its counsel for filing the motion in contravention of the court's scheduling order, which requires a party to request a conference with the court before moving for an order related to discovery.1 (Sched. Order (Dkt. #53) at 2.) The court expects the parties and their counsel to comply with all court orders and applicable rules; future violations will result in appropriate sanctions. Nevertheless, the court will consider Central Freight's motion. Accordingly, the court ORDERS the parties to appear at a telephonic hearing on the motion on Monday, April 30, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. The Courtroom Deputy will contact the parties with information about participating in the hearing. The court DIRECTS Amazon to respond to the motion subject to the Local Rules for the Western District of Washington. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(b)(2); id. LCR 7(d). Central Freight may, but is not required to, file a reply brief no later than the noting date. See id. LCR 7(b)(3); id. LCR 7(d).

FootNotes


1. The court further notes that the footer on the first page of Central Freight's motion references "Lane Powell PC" and provides the contact information for that law firm. (See id. at 1.) However, no attorney from Lane Powell has appeared in this case. (See Dkt.) The court expects counsel to file pleadings that accurately reflect the attorneys and law firms representing the parties.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer