Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Puget Sound Surgical Center P.S. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2:17-cv-01190. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180424754 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2018
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Amended Stipulated Protective Order. 1 The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket prot
More

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Amended Stipulated Protective Order.1 The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal.

2. "CONFIDENTIAL" MATERIAL

"Confidential" material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: commercially sensitive or proprietary information and protected health care information related to the medical claims at issue in the litigation that is deemed private under federal and state law, including but not limited to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and regulations promulgated thereunder ("HIPAA") and/or Chapter 70.02 of the Revised Code of Washington.

The parties acknowledge that certain confidential material relating to the specific medical claims at issue in this litigation may be Protected Health Information ("PHI") as defined by HIPAA and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § 164.512 and this order, the parties are authorized to receive, request, transmit, or disclose PHI concerning the specific medical claims at issue in this litigation, subject to all terms of this order. All PHI disclosed under this order must be designated as confidential material. PHI shall include, but is not limited to, claim data, claim forms, grievances, appeals, or other documents or records that contain any patient health information required to be kept confidential under any state or federal law, including the following subscriber, patient, or member identifiers:

a. names; b. all geographic subdivisions smaller than a State, including street address, city, county, precinct, and zip code; c. all elements of dates (except year) for dates directly related to an individual, including birth date, admission date, discharge date, age, and date of death; d. telephone numbers; e. fax numbers; f. electronic mail addresses; g. social security numbers; h. medical record numbers; i. health plan beneficiary numbers; j. account numbers; k. certificate/license numbers; l. vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, including license plate numbers; m. device identifiers and serial numbers; n. web universal resource locators ("URLs"); o. internet protocol ("IP") address numbers; p. biometric identifiers, including finger and voice prints; q. full face photographic images and any comparable images; and/or r. any other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code.

This order does not authorize the disclosure of PHI under any other circumstances.

The parties further acknowledge that certain confidential material relating to the specific medical claims at issue in this litigation may contain health care information deemed personal and sensitive information under Washington law, including but not limited to treatment records and/or information and records related to mental health services. See, e.g., Wash. Rev. Code §§ 70.02.005, 70.02.010, 70.02.230. Pursuant to the terms of this order, the parties are authorized to receive, request, transmit, or disclose such health care information with respect to the specific medical claims at issue in this litigation, subject to all terms of this order. All health care information disclosed under this order must be designated as confidential material. This order does not authorize the disclosure of health care information under any other circumstances.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither party may be compelled to disclose information and records related to sexually transmitted diseases unless specifically authorized by the patient and/or upon further order of this court after application showing good cause therefor. See Wash. Rev. Code § 70.02.220.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material.

However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.

4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL

4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement.

4.2 Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to:

(a) the receiving party's counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney's Eyes Only and is so designated;

(c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A);

(d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff;

(e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately return, or certify destruction of, all originals and copies of any confidential material;

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this agreement;

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

4.3 Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party to determine whether the designating party will remove the confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is warranted. Local Civil Rule 5(g) sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The designating party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the designating party to sanctions.

If it comes to a designating party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, the designating party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, disclosure or discovery material that qualifies for protection under this agreement must be clearly so designated before or when the material is disclosed or produced.

(a) Information in documentary form: (e.g., paper or electronic documents and deposition exhibits, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the designating party must affix the word "CONFIDENTIAL" to each page that contains confidential material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

(b) Testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings: the parties and any participating non-parties must identify on the record, during the deposition or other pretrial proceeding, all protected testimony, without prejudice to their right to so designate other testimony after reviewing the transcript. Any party or non-party may, within fifteen days after receiving the transcript of the deposition or other pretrial proceeding, designate portions of the transcript, or exhibits thereto, as confidential. If a party or non-party desires to protect confidential information at trial, the issue should be addressed during the pre-trial conference.

(c) Other tangible items: the producing party must affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the word "CONFIDENTIAL." If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the producing party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the designating party's right to secure protection under this agreement for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the receiving party must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this agreement.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any party or non-party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a designating party's confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. The parties must make every attempt to resolve any dispute regarding confidential designations without court involvement. Any motion regarding confidential designations or for a protective order must include a certification, in the motion or in a declaration or affidavit, that the movant has engaged in a good faith meet and confer conference with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The certification must list the date, manner, and participants to the conference. A good faith effort to confer requires a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference.

6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the designating party may file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Local Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Local Civil Rule 5(g), if applicable). The burden of persuasion in any such motion shall be on the designating party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the challenging party to sanctions. All parties shall continue to maintain the material in question as confidential until the court rules on the challenge.

7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION

If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL," that party must:

(a) promptly notify the designating party in writing and include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this agreement. Such notification shall include a copy of this agreement; and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the designating party whose confidential material may be affected.

8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed confidential material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this agreement, the receiving party must immediately (a) notify in writing the designating party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the protected material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this agreement, and (d) request that such person or persons execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL

When a producing party gives notice to receiving parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the receiving parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order or agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review. The parties agree to the entry of a non-waiver order under Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) as set forth herein.

10. NON TERMINATION AND RETURN OF DOCUMENTS

Within 60 days after the termination of this action, including all appeals, each receiving party must return all confidential material to the producing party, including all copies, extracts and summaries thereof. Alternatively, the parties may agree upon appropriate methods of destruction.

Notwithstanding this provision, counsel are entitled to retain one archival copy of all documents filed with the court, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits (except for exhibits containing PHI, which must be redacted, returned, or destroyed), expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain confidential material.

The confidentiality obligations imposed by this agreement shall remain in effect until a designating party agrees otherwise in writing or a court orders otherwise.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

AXELROD LLP DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Robert J. Axelrod Robert J. Axelrod, Pro Hac Vice 830 Third Ave., 5th Floor New York, NY 10022 646-448-5263 rjaxelrod@axelrodllp.com YOSHIDA LAW FIRM PLLC DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ D.K. Yoshida D.K. Yoshida, WSBA #17365 2025 First Avenue, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98121 206-456-7900 Fax: 206-456-7901 dyoshida@yoshidalawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Puget Sound Surgical Center P.S. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Eric McDonough Eric McDonough, Pro Hac Vice 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3021 310-201-5200 emedonough@seyfarth.com JENSEN MORSE BAKER DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Sarah E. Swale Steven Douglas Jensen Sarah E. Swale 216 First Ave S., Ste 204 Seattle, WA 98104 206-682-1550 sarah.swale@jmblawyers.com steve.jensen@jmblawyers.com Attorneys for Defendant Sound Health & Wellness Trust Plan GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Matthew G. Kleiner Matthew G. Kleiner, Pro Hac Vice 101 W. Broadway, Ste. 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 619-230-7419 mkleiner@grsm.com DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Sarah N. Turner Sarah N. Turner, WSBA #37748 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98104 206-695-5100 sturner@grsm.com ANDREWS KURTH KENYON DATED: April 13, 2018 /s/ Courtney Glaser John Shely, Pro Hac Vice Courtney Glaser, Pro Hac Vice 600 Travis Street, Ste. 4200 Houston, TX 77002 713-220-4123 jshely@andrewskurth.com cglaser@andrewskurth.com Attorneys for Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company; Aetna, Inc.; Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC Health and Welfare Plan; Amtrak Health Care Plan; America Health Care Plan; Nordstrom, Inc. Classic Plan; Starbucks Health Care Plan; Costco Wholesale Health Plan

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of any documents in this proceeding shall not, for the purposes of this proceeding or any other proceeding in any other court, constitute a waiver by the producing party of any privilege applicable to those documents, including the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product protection, or any other privilege or protection recognized by law.

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, _____________________ [print or type full name], of ______________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on [date] in the case of Puget Sound Surgical Center P.S. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al., No. 2:17-cv-01190. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

Date: ____________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: ______________________ Printed name: ______________________ Signature: _________________________ Dated this _____ day of ___________, 2018.

FootNotes


1. The Anchorage School District Active Employee Open Choice PPO Medical Plan has been dismissed from the case per order dated March 6, 2018 and is no longer a party to the action. (Docket No. 61.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer