Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Doe v. Trump, C17-0178JLR (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180514466 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 04, 2018
Latest Update: May 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Upon consideration of the above Stipulated Motion (Dkt. # 130) and the record in this matter, the Court denies as moot Defendants' Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Disposition of Cross-Appeals, ECF No. 110 (relating to Jewish Family Service of Seattle v. Trump, No. 17-1707) and, pursuant to the Parties' stipulation, stays all further proceedings and motion practice in the Jewish Family Service of Seattle (" JFS ") and Doe cases
More

ORDER

Upon consideration of the above Stipulated Motion (Dkt. # 130) and the record in this matter, the Court denies as moot Defendants' Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Disposition of Cross-Appeals, ECF No. 110 (relating to Jewish Family Service of Seattle v. Trump, No. 17-1707) and, pursuant to the Parties' stipulation, stays all further proceedings and motion practice in the Jewish Family Service of Seattle ("JFS") and Doe cases except the following: (1) Plaintiffs' reinstated discovery motion and any discovery permitted by the Court pursuant to its order resolving that motion; (2) Defendants' forthcoming Rule 12(b)(1) motion; and (3) any other proceedings and motions relating to this Court's preliminary injunction Order. Defendants need not answer the operative JFS Complaint before the Court resolves Defendants' forthcoming Rule 12(b)(1) motion, and the JFS Plaintiffs need not move for class certification until the Court resolves the Rule 12(b)(1) motion and discovery motion and any related discovery is complete. Should the Court deny the Rule 12(b)(1) motion, the JFS Plaintiffs and Defendants will confer on the proposed timing of Defendants' further responsive pleading and will submit a proposal to the Court. If the Court allows any discovery, the Parties will confer on the timing of JFS Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and will submit a proposal to the Court once that discovery is complete and the Court has decided the Rule 12(b)(1) motion. Should any Party determine that additional motion practice may be necessary, the Parties shall meet and confer prior to the filing of any such motion.

Defendants' contemplated Rule 12(b)(1) motion shall be briefed on the following schedule: Defendants shall file their Rule 12(b)(1) motion on or before May 25, 2018; the Doe and JFS Plaintiffs shall file their opposition briefs on or before June 19, 2018; and Defendants shall file their consolidated reply brief on or before June 29, 2018. Defendants' reply brief shall not exceed twenty-four (24) pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer