Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC, C17-0537JLR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180921f52
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY EXHIBIT LIMITATION JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is Leslie Jack and David Jack's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Modification of Exhibit Limitation, Equal Application Thereto, and Offer of Proof. (Mot. (Dkt. # 703).) Defendants Ford Motor Company and DCo, LLC (f/k/a Dana Companies, LLC) oppose Plaintiffs' motion. (Ford Resp. (Dkt. # 705); DCo Resp. (Dkt. # 710).) Having considered the motion and Defendants' responses
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY EXHIBIT LIMITATION JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is Leslie Jack and David Jack's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Modification of Exhibit Limitation, Equal Application Thereto, and Offer of Proof. (Mot. (Dkt. # 703).) Defendants Ford Motor Company and DCo, LLC (f/k/a Dana Companies, LLC) oppose Plaintiffs' motion. (Ford Resp. (Dkt. # 705); DCo Resp. (Dkt. # 710).) Having considered the motion and Defendants' responses,..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY EXHIBIT LIMITATION
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Before the court is Leslie Jack and David Jack's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Modification of Exhibit Limitation, Equal Application Thereto, and Offer of Proof. (Mot. (Dkt. # 703).) Defendants Ford Motor Company and DCo, LLC (f/k/a Dana Companies, LLC) oppose Plaintiffs' motion. (Ford Resp. (Dkt. # 705); DCo Resp. (Dkt. # 710).)
Having considered the motion and Defendants' responses, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion to modify its exhibit list to include those exhibits listed in Exhibit 1 to Thomas J. Breen's declaration in support of Plaintiffs' motion. (See Breen Decl. (Dkt. # 704) ¶ 9, Ex. 1.) The court makes no ruling on the authenticity or admissibility of the exhibits at this time. Defendants may designate additional exhibits responsive to Plaintiffs' new ones within six (6) days of the date of this order.
Source: Leagle
