Enstad v. PeaceHealth, 2:17-cv-01496-RSM. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180925i27
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, and Plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad ("Plaintiffs"), through counsel, to stay proceedings in this action, the Court having considered the Stipulated Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore: ORDERED that: 1. The existing stay of all pr
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, and Plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad ("Plaintiffs"), through counsel, to stay proceedings in this action, the Court having considered the Stipulated Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore: ORDERED that: 1. The existing stay of all pro..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, and Plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad ("Plaintiffs"), through counsel, to stay proceedings in this action, the Court having considered the Stipulated Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore:
ORDERED that:
1. The existing stay of all proceedings in this action shall continue for an additional 30 days through and including October 23, 2018.
2. The parties shall file an update with the Court regarding the status of the parties' settlement negotiations on or before October 23, 2018 unless the case has been settled and dismissed before that date.
Source: Leagle
