Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mason v. Seattle Tunnel Partners, C17-186 MJP. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20181024o81 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION MARSHA J. PECHMAN , Senior District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration re: Defendant's Motion for Fees (Dkt. No. 90), rules as follows: IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Motions for reconsideration are disfavored in this district and will be denied absent "a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts of legal authority which could not have been brought to its attenti
More

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

The Court, having received and reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration re: Defendant's Motion for Fees (Dkt. No. 90), rules as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

Motions for reconsideration are disfavored in this district and will be denied absent "a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts of legal authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence." LR 7(h).

Plaintiff's motion adduces neither new facts or legal authority, and does little else than reiterate the points made in his response to Defendant's original motion. The Court did not find them persuasive the first time and does not find that that they demonstrate the "manifest error" required for reconsideration of the prior order.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer