Sound Action v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 18-cv-00733-JLR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20181025713
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ENTRY OF SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Plaintiffs Sound Action, Friends of the San Juans, and Washington Environmental Council (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stipulate as follows: 1. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the above-captioned matter. 2. On July 23, 2018, Defendant moved for a 60-day extension of time
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ENTRY OF SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Plaintiffs Sound Action, Friends of the San Juans, and Washington Environmental Council (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stipulate as follows: 1. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the above-captioned matter. 2. On July 23, 2018, Defendant moved for a 60-day extension of time ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ENTRY OF SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sound Action, Friends of the San Juans, and Washington Environmental Council (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stipulate as follows:
1. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the above-captioned matter.
2. On July 23, 2018, Defendant moved for a 60-day extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. On July 24, 2018, the extension was granted.
3. On September 28, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Claim 1 for Lack of Jurisdiction, with a noting date of October 26, 2018. (See Dkt. #13.) Under L.C.R. 7(d), Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss is currently due October 22, 2018, and Defendant's reply is due October 26, 2018.
4. To afford the parties the additional time they need to complete briefing on the issues raised by Defendant's motion to dismiss, the parties respectfully request that the following proposed schedule be entered:
a. On or before October 29, 2018, Plaintiffs will file an opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss.
b. On or before November 15, 2018, Defendant will file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss.
c. Defendant's motion to dismis (Dkt. #13) shall be noted for November 15, 2018.
SO STIPULATED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
