Bitmain Technologies Ltd. v. Doe, 2:18-cv-1626. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20181128h10
Visitors: 67
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO CONDUCT IMMEDIATE NON-PARTY DISCOVERY THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . The Court, having considered plaintiff Bitmain Technologies Ltd. ("Bitmain")'s Ex Parte Motion, docket no. 3, for Permission to Conduct Immediate Non-Party Discovery, hereby GRANTS the motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) and based upon good cause shown as presented in plaintiff's motion and supporting affidavit. It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff may serve immediate dis
Summary: ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO CONDUCT IMMEDIATE NON-PARTY DISCOVERY THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . The Court, having considered plaintiff Bitmain Technologies Ltd. ("Bitmain")'s Ex Parte Motion, docket no. 3, for Permission to Conduct Immediate Non-Party Discovery, hereby GRANTS the motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) and based upon good cause shown as presented in plaintiff's motion and supporting affidavit. It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff may serve immediate disc..
More
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO CONDUCT IMMEDIATE NON-PARTY DISCOVERY
THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge.
The Court, having considered plaintiff Bitmain Technologies Ltd. ("Bitmain")'s Ex Parte Motion, docket no. 3, for Permission to Conduct Immediate Non-Party Discovery, hereby GRANTS the motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) and based upon good cause shown as presented in plaintiff's motion and supporting affidavit.
It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff may serve immediate discovery requests on Bittrex, Inc. to identify the John Doe defendant, locate and recover the stolen property, and preserve the evidence in support of this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
