Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Wright, CR18-298JLR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190110727 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE (PROPOSED) JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for a continuance of the trial and the pretrial motions due date, and the Court having considered the facts set forth in the motion, the speedy trial waiver executed by defendant, and the records and files herein, the Court finds as follows: The Court finds that the ends of justice will be se
More

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE

(PROPOSED)

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for a continuance of the trial and the pretrial motions due date, and the Court having considered the facts set forth in the motion, the speedy trial waiver executed by defendant, and the records and files herein, the Court finds as follows:

The Court finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to ensure adequate time for effective case preparation, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

1. A failure to grant the continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). In addition, the failure to grant a continuance in the proceeding would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).

2. The ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance in this case, as a continuance is necessary to ensure adequate time for the defense to effectively prepare for trial. All of these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date shall be continued from February 11, 2019, to April 15, 2019, and the pretrial motions deadline be continued to March 4, 2019.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the resulting period of delay from the date of this order to the new trial date is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer