Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. v. Suid, 2:17-cv-01481-MAT. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190111g04
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING RITCHIE BROS.' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MARY ALICE THEILER , Magistrate Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER This Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. ("Ritchie Bros.") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and LCR 55(b)(4) and all material filed by the parties in connection with that Motion, and finding good cause to grant Ritchie Bros.' Motion for Default Judgment, hereby ORDERS that: (1) Ritchie Bros.' Mo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING RITCHIE BROS.' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MARY ALICE THEILER , Magistrate Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER This Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. ("Ritchie Bros.") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and LCR 55(b)(4) and all material filed by the parties in connection with that Motion, and finding good cause to grant Ritchie Bros.' Motion for Default Judgment, hereby ORDERS that: (1) Ritchie Bros.' Mot..
More
ORDER GRANTING RITCHIE BROS.' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
MARY ALICE THEILER, Magistrate Judge.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. ("Ritchie Bros.") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and LCR 55(b)(4) and all material filed by the parties in connection with that Motion, and finding good cause to grant Ritchie Bros.' Motion for Default Judgment, hereby ORDERS that:
(1) Ritchie Bros.' Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED; and
(2) Defendants, jointly and severally, are liable to Ritchie Bros. in the principal amount of $236,154.86. Interest shall accrue on this amount beginning on the date of entry of this Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
(3) Defendants, jointly and severally, shall tender payment to Ritchie Bros. in satisfaction of the above-stated principal amount and accrued interest on or before January 24, 2019.
In the interest of clarity, the Court notes that this Order does not grant any relief against Mohammad Suid personally, but rather grants relief against Defendant Naem Suid and against the legal entity (i.e., partnership) that Naem Suid formed with Mohammad Suid.
It is so Ordered.
Source: Leagle
