ORDER

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Government's motion to seal its sentencing memorandum (Dkt. No. 40). The Government argues that its memorandum and attached exhibits contain private and sensitive information concerning "unsubstantiated claims the defendant made and subsequent investigations stemming from those claims," which implicate the privacy interests of Defendant and the victim. (Id.)

"[T]here is a strong presumption of public access to [the Court's] files." W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g)(3); Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, a particularized showing of good cause will suffice to maintain under seal documents attached to a non-dispositive motion. Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). This rule provides an exception to the "strong presumption in favor of [public] access" to judicial records. Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1135).

The Government has not made a particularized showing of good cause sufficient to merit maintaining its sentencing memorandum under seal. Defendant's claims were unsubstantiated, and the reports of the resultant investigations are brief and do not contain private and sensitive information implicating the privacy interests of Defendant or the victim. Therefore, the Government's motion to seal (Dkt. No. 40) is DENIED. Within 48 hours of the issuance of this order, the Government shall withdraw its sentencing memorandum that is currently under seal. (Dkt. No. 41.) In its place, the Government shall publicly file its sentencing memorandum. The Government may elect to file a redacted version of its sentencing memorandum.