Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bautista v. WFS Express, C18-757 RSM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190211e35 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1), the parties move for an order modifying the scheduling order to extend all existing deadlines by two months. See Dkt. #18. In support of this request, the parties stipulate and agree that, despite the parties' diligence, additional time is needed to complete pre-class certification discovery contemplated under the existing case schedule due to the compl
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1), the parties move for an order modifying the scheduling order to extend all existing deadlines by two months. See Dkt. #18.

In support of this request, the parties stipulate and agree that, despite the parties' diligence, additional time is needed to complete pre-class certification discovery contemplated under the existing case schedule due to the complexity of this case. Id. This is the parties' second request to modify the scheduling order. The parties believe that a brief two-month extension will enable both to complete necessary discovery and proceed with class certification briefing as contemplated in the existing scheduling order.

For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion, and enter a modified case schedule extending all existing deadlines by two months.

ORDER

The parties' stipulated motion is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to issue an amended scheduling order extending each deadline by two months.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer