Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. HTC America, Inc., 2:18-cv-1731-JLR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190211f18 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HTC AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . I. STIPULATION Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC and Defendant HTC America, Inc. ("HTC"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows. 1. HTC was served with the Summons and Complaint on January 25, 2019 and its Answer is currently due on February 15, 2019. Based on the recent retention of defense counsel and th
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HTC AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

I. STIPULATION

Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC and Defendant HTC America, Inc. ("HTC"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows.

1. HTC was served with the Summons and Complaint on January 25, 2019 and its Answer is currently due on February 15, 2019. Based on the recent retention of defense counsel and the need for more time to assess claims and defenses, HTC seeks an extension of 30 days to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff has agreed to HTC's extension request.

2. The parties agree that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint with such pleadings, motions, or objections as it deems appropriate should be extended to March 18, 2019.

3. HTC requests that the Court enter the subjoined Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

II. ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant HTC America, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to March 18, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer