Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. v. S3 Holding LLC, : 18-cv-224-RSL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190214h79 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1), 7(j), 10(g) and 16(b)(5) of this Court and for good cause, Plaintiff Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. ("SPI") and Defendants S3 Holding LLC and Olivia Miller, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move that the Court extend the current March 3, 2019 discovery cutoff to March 14, 2019, exclusively for the purpose of allowi
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS

Pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1), 7(j), 10(g) and 16(b)(5) of this Court and for good cause, Plaintiff Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. ("SPI") and Defendants S3 Holding LLC and Olivia Miller, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move that the Court extend the current March 3, 2019 discovery cutoff to March 14, 2019, exclusively for the purpose of allowing the parties to complete taking depositions of each other's witnesses.

In support of this motion, the parties have diligently attempted to schedule depositions of each other's witnesses for dates prior to the current March 3, 2019 deadline to complete discovery. See Second Amended Order Setting Trial Date & Related Dates (Doc. No. 31). Unfortunately, the witnesses and counsel have been unable to find available dates on which all of these depositions can be taken before the current close of discovery. The parties have confirmed deposition dates that will result in the last deposition being taken on March 14, 2019. To allow the parties to complete deposition discovery in this case, the parties jointly request that the Court extend the current March 3, 2019 discovery cutoff to March 14, 2019, exclusively for the purpose of allowing the parties to complete their respective depositions.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer