Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Acarregui, C17-1782 RSM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190322f60 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Upon consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Entry of Judgment (the "Stipulated Motion") (Dkt. # 17) filed herein by the United States of America ("United States") and Refawne L. Acarregui, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court, finding no just reason for delay, GRANTS the Stipulated Motion. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the United States on its Complaint
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Entry of Judgment (the "Stipulated Motion") (Dkt. # 17) filed herein by the United States of America ("United States") and Refawne L. Acarregui, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court, finding no just reason for delay, GRANTS the Stipulated Motion.

2. Judgment is entered in favor of the United States on its Complaint (Dkt. # 1) and against Refawne L. Acarregui.

3. Refawne L. Acarregui is individually and personally indebted to the United States under 26 U.S.C. § 6324(a)(2) and 31 U.S.C. § 3713(b) for the unpaid federal estate tax liability (Form 706) of the Robert L. Smith Estate ("Smith Estate") and Smith Estate assets that she distributed to herself without first paying federal taxes owed by the Smith Estate, in the amount of $125,675.43 as of February 7, 2019, plus statutory interest which continues to accrue as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622 and other statutory additions as provided by law, less any subsequent payments or credits, until paid in full.

4. Each party shall bear its own respective costs and attorney's fees.

5. The current scheduling order, Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates dated February 8, 2019 (Dkt. # 16), is VACATED.

6. The Clerk of Court shall issue a Judgment consistent with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer