Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC v. Point-It!, Inc., C19-154 RSM. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190415h83
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint, and to accordingly extend the deadlines for the discovery conference and Joint Status Report. Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019. Defendant requires additional time to
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint, and to accordingly extend the deadlines for the discovery conference and Joint Status Report. Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019. Defendant requires additional time to ..
More
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint, and to accordingly extend the deadlines for the discovery conference and Joint Status Report.
Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019. Defendant requires additional time to investigate Plaintiff's claims, and thus seeks a 30-day extension of the Answer deadline to May 8, 2019. Plaintiff stipulates to this extension. Moreover, the initial deadlines set by the Court for a Rule 26(f) conference, Initial Disclosures and Joint Status Report passed before Defendant was served with the Complaint. The Parties therefore seek an extension of these three deadlines to align with the new deadline for Defendant to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Proposed deadlines are identified in the proposed order contained below.
For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully ask the Court to grant this stipulated motion and extend the case schedule in accordance with the proposed order below.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants have until May 8, 2019, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial discovery deadlines set by the Court are reset as follows:
Deadline Date
Rule 26(f) conference May 15, 2019
Initial Disclosures May 29, 2019
Joint Status Report June 5, 2019
Source: Leagle