Wilson v. U.S., C19-489RSL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190419l20
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . On April 5, 2019, this Court issued an Order Directing the United States to Answer 2255 Petition, in the above-captioned matter. The Order was mailed to plaintiff but was returned unopened on April 15, 2019, as petitioner apparently no longer resides at the address on file with the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the Order Directing the United States to Answer 2255 Petition and to note a "Rule 41 dismissal proceedi
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . On April 5, 2019, this Court issued an Order Directing the United States to Answer 2255 Petition, in the above-captioned matter. The Order was mailed to plaintiff but was returned unopened on April 15, 2019, as petitioner apparently no longer resides at the address on file with the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the Order Directing the United States to Answer 2255 Petition and to note a "Rule 41 dismissal proceedin..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
On April 5, 2019, this Court issued an Order Directing the United States to Answer § 2255 Petition, in the above-captioned matter. The Order was mailed to plaintiff but was returned unopened on April 15, 2019, as petitioner apparently no longer resides at the address on file with the Court.
The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the Order Directing the United States to Answer § 2255 Petition and to note a "Rule 41 dismissal proceeding" on the calendar for June 21, 2019. If plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties of his current address by that date, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2).
Source: Leagle
