Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ford v. Commissioner of Social Security, C18-191 TSZ. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190422e47 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, docket no. 23, plaintiff's objections to the R&R, docket no. 24, and the Commissioner's response to plaintiff's objections, docket no. 25, the Court does hereby ORDER as follows: (1) The R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's contention that the R&R failed to address issues raised in Sections IV and V of the opening brief, docket no. 16, lacks merit. The R&R concludes tha
More

ORDER

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, docket no. 23, plaintiff's objections to the R&R, docket no. 24, and the Commissioner's response to plaintiff's objections, docket no. 25, the Court does hereby ORDER as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's contention that the R&R failed to address issues raised in Sections IV and V of the opening brief, docket no. 16, lacks merit. The R&R concludes that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") did not err in assessing plaintiff's residual functional capacity, which is summarized at AR 29, or in ruling that plaintiff is capable of performing past relevant work as a receptionist, and thus, the R&R was not required to analyze the additional matters raised in Sections IV and V of the opening brief.

(2) The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order, to send a copy of this Order and the judgment to all counsel of record, and to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer