Bombardier Inc. v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, C18-1543JLR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190529i47
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSES TO SURREPLIES JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7(g)(4), the court ORDERS Plaintiff Bombardier Inc. ("Bombardier") to respond to Defendant Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation's surreply (MITAC Surreply (Dkt. # 210)) and Defendants Keith Ayre and Marc-Antoine Delarche's surreply (A&D Surreply (Dkt. # 213)); see also Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(g)(4). Bombardier shall file its responses no later than June 3, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. and shall limit e
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSES TO SURREPLIES JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7(g)(4), the court ORDERS Plaintiff Bombardier Inc. ("Bombardier") to respond to Defendant Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation's surreply (MITAC Surreply (Dkt. # 210)) and Defendants Keith Ayre and Marc-Antoine Delarche's surreply (A&D Surreply (Dkt. # 213)); see also Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(g)(4). Bombardier shall file its responses no later than June 3, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. and shall limit ea..
More
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSES TO SURREPLIES
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7(g)(4), the court ORDERS Plaintiff Bombardier Inc. ("Bombardier") to respond to Defendant Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation's surreply (MITAC Surreply (Dkt. # 210)) and Defendants Keith Ayre and Marc-Antoine Delarche's surreply (A&D Surreply (Dkt. # 213)); see also Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(g)(4). Bombardier shall file its responses no later than June 3, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. and shall limit each response to three pages. If the court finds that misconduct necessitated the surreplies, the court will consider sanctions. Likewise, if the court finds that the surreplies are unnecessarily litigious, the court will consider sanctions.
Source: Leagle
