Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Abdulle v. Uttecht, C19-37-MJP-BAT. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190530h28 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA , Magistrate Judge . THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion to extend the current briefing schedule (Dkt. 11) in this case hereby GRANTS the requested extension. IT IS ORDERED that briefing schedule be modified as follows: 1. Petitioner shall either file an Amended Petition or notify Respondent that he has determined that he will not do so by July 30, 2019. 2. Respondent shall have 45 days from the
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion to extend the current briefing schedule (Dkt. 11) in this case hereby GRANTS the requested extension.

IT IS ORDERED that briefing schedule be modified as follows:

1. Petitioner shall either file an Amended Petition or notify Respondent that he has determined that he will not do so by July 30, 2019.

2. Respondent shall have 45 days from the date that Petitioner files, or informs of their decision not to file an Amended Petition, to file its Answer, which otherwise shall conform to the provisions of this Court's prior order.

3. Respondent shall note its Answer for the Friday following 45 days after the filing of its Answer. Petitioner's response shall be filed by that noting date.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer