Bausch v. U.S., 2:18-CV-265-RMP. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190614b99
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Preservation of Privilege Claims, ECF No. 27-1. Having reviewed the proposed order and the remaining record, the Court finds that good cause exists to enter the parties' proposed Protective Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 27-1, is ENTERED. The protective order is s
Summary: JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Preservation of Privilege Claims, ECF No. 27-1. Having reviewed the proposed order and the remaining record, the Court finds that good cause exists to enter the parties' proposed Protective Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 27-1, is ENTERED. The protective order is se..
More
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Preservation of Privilege Claims, ECF No. 27-1. Having reviewed the proposed order and the remaining record, the Court finds that good cause exists to enter the parties' proposed Protective Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 27-1, is ENTERED. The protective order is set forth below:
1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
2. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to counsel.
Source: Leagle
