Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Zellmer v. Holbrook, C17-1776 RSM-BAT. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190626f09 Visitors: 51
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE BY JULY 1, 2019 AND RENOTING PETITION FOR JULY 8, 2019 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA , Chief Magistrate Judge . The Court earlier granted petitioner's stipulated request to extend the deadlines for the remaining briefs. Dkt. 25. Petitioner's response brief was due on June 24, 2019. Dkt. 25. Petitioner has yet to file a response brief. The Court presumes that petitioner's earlier request for an extension time meant that he intended on filing a response brie
More

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE BY JULY 1, 2019 AND RENOTING PETITION FOR JULY 8, 2019

The Court earlier granted petitioner's stipulated request to extend the deadlines for the remaining briefs. Dkt. 25. Petitioner's response brief was due on June 24, 2019. Dkt. 25. Petitioner has yet to file a response brief.

The Court presumes that petitioner's earlier request for an extension time meant that he intended on filing a response brief. The Court therefore DIRECTS petitioner to file a response to the habeas answer by July 1, 2019. If he does not do so by that date, the Court will presume that petitioner intends to rely only upon the argumentation in the habeas petition itself. Respondent may file an optional reply brief on July 8, 2019. The Court RENOTES consideration of respondent's habeas answer for July 8, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer