STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM INITIAL SCHEDULING DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM INITIAL SCHEDULING DEADLINES (ECF No. 22)

MARY ALICE THEILER, Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, on June 17, 2019, the Court entered an Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement, ECF No. 11 (the "Initial Scheduling Order");

WHEREAS, on June 27, 2019, in accord with procedures stated in the Initial Scheduling Order, the Atonomi Defendants emailed Courtroom Deputy Kadya Peter requesting, among other things, a stay of the deadlines imposed in the Initial Scheduling Order pending resolution of a forthcoming motion to compel arbitration and, if necessary, a temporary stay of those same deadlines pending resolution of any motion for relief from the deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Order pending resolution of the motion to compel arbitration;

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2019, Courtroom Deputy Timothy Farrell advised the parties that "[t]he deadlines will remain as they are until any motion to compel, or otherwise, is filed" (emphasis added);

WHEREAS, on July 2, 2019, defendants Atonomi LLC, Centri Technology LLC, Vaughan Emery, Rob Strickland, Kyle Strickland, Don DeLoach, Wayne Wisehart, Woody Benson, Michael Mackey, James Salter, and Luis Paris (collectively, the "Atonomi Defendants") filed a Motion for Relief from Initial Scheduling Deadlines Pending Decision on Motion to Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 22 (the "Motion");

WHEREAS, the Motion is noted for consideration on July 12, 2019;

WHEREAS, the first deadline in the Initial Scheduling Order is July 8, 2019, for the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference;

WHEREAS, extending the deadlines set in the Initial Scheduling Order pending resolution of the Motion will preserve judicial and party resources;

WHEREAS, all the parties to this action have conferred and agreed among themselves to jointly request the Court to (1) stay the deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Order pending the Court's resolution of the Motion, and (2) issue new deadlines for the parties if the Motion is denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record, jointly move as follows:

1. The parties respectfully request the Court to stay deadlines imposed in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order pending resolution of the Motion.

2. The parties respectfully request the Court to issue new deadlines for the events identified in the Initial Scheduling Order if the Motion is denied.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2019.