Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Berkelhammer v. Funko, Inc., C18-812 RSM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190712f12 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER APPLYING STAY OF CERTAIN CASE DEADLINES [DKT. 42] TO DEFENDANT FUNDAMENTAL CAPITAL, LLC RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . I. STIPULATION 1. On April 10, 2019, the Court granted the Stipulated Motion to stay certain case deadlines filed by Plaintiffs and the then named defendants [ see Dkt. 42] until after a ruling on the pending Motions to Dismiss filed by those defendants in an action currently pending in the Superior Court of Washington, King Count
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER APPLYING STAY OF CERTAIN CASE DEADLINES [DKT. 42] TO DEFENDANT FUNDAMENTAL CAPITAL, LLC

I. STIPULATION

1. On April 10, 2019, the Court granted the Stipulated Motion to stay certain case deadlines filed by Plaintiffs and the then named defendants [see Dkt. 42] until after a ruling on the pending Motions to Dismiss filed by those defendants in an action currently pending in the Superior Court of Washington, King County. The state court action, captioned In re Funko, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 17-2-29838-7 SEA (the "State Case"), like this action, alleges claims regarding defendant Funko Inc.'s initial public offering, Subsequent to this Court's order on the Stipulation, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in this lawsuit which for the first time named Defendant Fundamental Capital, LLC ("Fundamental Capital") as a party.

2. On April 10, 2019, the Court granted the Stipulated Motion to stay certain case deadlines filed by Plaintiffs and the then named defendants [see Dkt. 42] until after a ruling on the pending Motions to Dismiss filed by those defendants in an action currently pending in the Superior Court of Washington, King County. The state court action, captioned In re Funko, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 17-2-29838-7 SEA (the "State Case"), like this action, alleges claims regarding defendant Funko Inc.'s initial public offering, Subsequent to this Court's order on the Stipulation, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in this lawsuit which for the first time named Defendant Fundamental Capital, LLC ("Fundamental Capital") as a party.

3. Fundamental Capital is also a named defendant in the State Case and has also filed a Motion to Dismiss in the State Case. The court in the State Case has not issued any ruling on Fundamental Capital's Motion to Dismiss.

4. On May 16, 2019, Defendant Fundamental Capital, LLC executed a waiver of service in this lawsuit.

5. Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g) and without waiving any of their rights, arguments, claims, or defenses, Lead Plaintiff Carl Berkelhammer ("Lead Plaintiff") and Fundamental Capital, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the stay ordered in Dkt. 42, including all deadlines and terms set forth therein, also applies to Fundamental Capital.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC Kim D. Stephens, WSBA #11984 Janissa A. Strabuk, WSBA #21827 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Telephone: (206) 682-5600 kstephens@tousley.com jstrabuk@tousley.com SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobson [email authorization] Thomas L. Laughlin, IV (pro hac vice) Jeffrey P. Jacobson (pro hac vice) The Helmsley Building 230 Park Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10169 Telephone: (212) 223-6444 tlaughlin@scott-scott.com jjacobson@scott-scott.com Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Carl Berkelhammer SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP By: /s/ Stephen C. Willey Stephen C. Willey, WSBA #24499 1425 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101 Telephone: (206) 749-0500 swilley@sbwllp.com REED SMITH LLP James L. Sanders (pro hac vice pending) Carla M. Wirtschafter (pro hac vice pending) 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 734-5200 jsanders@reedsmith.com cwirtschafter@reedsmith.com Attorneys for Defendant Fundamental Capital, LLC

II. ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, it is so ORDERED this 11th day of July 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer