Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jinni Tech, Ltd. v. Red.com, Inc., C17-0217JLR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190716f62 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is the parties' joint status report ("JSR"). (JSR (Dkt. # 70).) In the JSR, the parties explain that the companion lawsuit in the Central District of California, see Red.com, Inc. v. Jinni Tech, Ltd., No. 8:17-cv-00382-CJC-KES, (C.D. Cal.) ("the California case"), resolved on June 26, 2019. ( Id. at 1; see also id. at 5-7 (order granting voluntary dismissal in the California case).) The court previously stayed this action pendin
More

ORDER

Before the court is the parties' joint status report ("JSR"). (JSR (Dkt. # 70).) In the JSR, the parties explain that the companion lawsuit in the Central District of California, see Red.com, Inc. v. Jinni Tech, Ltd., No. 8:17-cv-00382-CJC-KES, (C.D. Cal.) ("the California case"), resolved on June 26, 2019. (Id. at 1; see also id. at 5-7 (order granting voluntary dismissal in the California case).) The court previously stayed this action pending resolution of the California case. (See 10/26/18 Order (Dkt. # 59) at 15-16.) In the court's order that stayed this action, the court ordered the parties to file a JSR within 14 days of the completion of the proceedings in the California case "briefly outlining the resolution of the California case and proposing a new case schedule." (Id.)

On June 24, 2019, two days before the California case resolved, the court granted Philip Mann's unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs Jinni Tech, Ltd. and Bruce Royce (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). (6/24/19 Order (Dkt. # 68).) In that order, the court specified that Mr. Mann's withdrawal would not be effective for 30 days. (Id. at 6-7.) Thus, Mr. Mann remains as Plaintiffs' counsel until July 24, 2019.

On July 3, 2019, the parties filed the JSR, outlining the resolution of the California case and requesting that the court "hold this matter in abeyance until such time as new counsel for Plaintiff[s] appears or until the time for Plaintiff[s] to secure new counsel expires." (JSR at 2.)

In light of the circumstances, the court GRANTS the parties' request. Specifically, the court extends the time for the parties to propose a new case schedule until 14 days after either new counsel for Plaintiffs appears or the time for Plaintiffs to secure new counsel expires.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer