Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

King County v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 2:14-cv-01957 BJR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190717f62 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON AND CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, AND BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S (FKA STONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY) MOTION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND BARRING CLAIMS NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: June 7, 2019 BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berksh
More

ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON AND CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, AND BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S (FKA STONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY) MOTION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND BARRING CLAIMS

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: June 7, 2019

This matter comes before the Court on Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company fka Stonewall Insurance Company's (collectively "Settling Insurers") Motion for Order Approving Settlement and Barring Claims re Settling Insurers' Policies. The Court has considered the motion and all pleadings and filings on record.

The Court GRANTS Settling Insurers' Motion for Order Approving Settlement and Barring Claims and APPROVES the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") between Plaintiff King County and Settling Insurers. The Court further FINDS and ORDERS:

1. The Settlement Agreement is reasonable, and was the result of arm's-length negotiations between parties represented by counsel. The Settlement Agreement is not collusive, inadequate, or entered into for any other improper purpose.

2. The non-settling insurers are adequately protected based on the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and King County's representations related to potential setoff for settlements in this case. See King County v. Travelers Indemn. Co., 2018 WL 1792189, at *3 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 16, 2018).

3. The Court ORDERS that the claims, cross-claims and counterclaims, by and against Settling Insurers in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court further ORDERS that any other claims for contribution, allocation, subrogation, and equitable indemnity, and any other cause of action in connection with this action against Settling Insurers by any other insurers of King County are hereby BARRED.

4. The Court DIRECTS that this Order shall be entered as a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Brian A. Kelly Brian A. Kelly, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Duane Morris LLP Spear Tower One Market Plaza, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94105-1127 Telephone: 415.957.3000 Facsimile: 415.957.3001 Email: bakelly@duanemorris.com Kyle Silk-Eglit, WSBA No. 43177 Duane Morris LLP 801 Second Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone: 206.467.1065 Facsimile: 415.957.3001 Email: ksilkeglit@duanemorris.com Attorneys for Defendants Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company fka Stonewall Insurance Company
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer