ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.

This matter is before the Court sua sponte following the Minute Order of the Honorable John C. Coughenour directing the Clerk to reassign Case No. C19-965RSM to the Undersigned (formerly Case No. C19-965JCC). In that case, Judge Coughenour's order for reassignment followed Defendant's Notice of Related Cases (Dkt. #12 in Case No. C19-965RSM) detailing the relatedness of this case and Case No. C19-964RSM. Defendant has also filed a similar Notice of Related Cases in this action. Dkt. #13. The Court agrees with Judge Coughenour and Defendant that these two actions are indeed related as provided in Local Civil Rule 3(g)(4) and that it appears that parallel litigation will be duplicitous and an undue burden on the Court and the parties.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42, where "actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the actions; (2) consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay." FED. R. CIV. P. 42(A). Both a court's inherent power to control and manage its own docket and the wording of Rule 42 support a court consolidating cases sua sponte and even over the objection of the parties. Prestige v. United States, No. CV-14-413-PHX-DKD, 2014 WL 11332313, at *2 (D. Ariz. Mar. 10, 2014) (citing In re Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987) ("Because consolidation is within the broad discretion of the district court, . . . trial courts may consolidate cases sua sponte [.]"); Blasko v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 243 F.R.D. 13, 15 (D.D.C. 2007) ("By its plain language, Rule 42(a) permits sua sponte consolidation.")).

Nevertheless, the Court finds it appropriate to provide the parties an opportunity to address the issue. Accordingly, the Court finds and ORDERS that within fourteen (14) days of this Order each party may show cause: (1) why this case is or is not related to Case No. C19-965RSM and (2) why this case should or should not be consolidated with Case No. C19-965RSM. Any response to this Order shall be limited to five double-spaced pages. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a copy of this Order at: P.O. Box 3388, Federal Way, Washington 98063.