King County v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 2:14-cv-01957 BJR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190807e10
Visitors: 35
Filed: Aug. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL [CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED] BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company's (fka Stonewall Insurance Company) Motion Approving Settlement and Barring Claims (Dkt. 807), plaintiff, King County, and defend
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL [CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED] BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company's (fka Stonewall Insurance Company) Motion Approving Settlement and Barring Claims (Dkt. 807), plaintiff, King County, and defenda..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
[CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED]
BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company's (fka Stonewall Insurance Company) Motion Approving Settlement and Barring Claims (Dkt. 807), plaintiff, King County, and defendants, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies ("London Market Insurers"), hereby stipulate that King County's claims against London Market Insurers are dismissed with prejudice, and without an award of fees or costs to either party, such that London Market Insurers are no longer parties to the case. This stipulation does not affect the remaining claims of King County in its Fourth Amended Complaint against any other defendant.
AGREED AND STIPULATED.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THIS 31st day of July, 2019.
By: /s/Kyle Silk-Eglit
Brian A. Kelly (admitted pro hac vice)
Duane Morris LLP
Spear Tower
One Market Plaza, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1127
Telephone: (415) 957-3213
Facsimile: (415) 651-9601
Email: bakelly@duanemorris.com
Kyle Silk-Eglit, WSBA No. 43177
Duane Morris LLP
801 Second Avenue, Suite 800
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: (415) 957-3048
Facsimile: (206) 299-9593
Email: ksilkeglit@duanemorris.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and
Certain London Market Companies, North
River Insurance Company, and Berkshire
Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company fka
Stonewall Insurance Company
By: /s/John Bjorkman
John Bjorkman, WSBA #13426
K&L Gates LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, Washington 98104
Phone: (206) 623-7580
Fax: (206) 623-7022
Email: john.bjorkman@klgates.com
Michael J. Lynch (admitted pro hac vice)
Paul E. Del Vecchio (admitted pro hac vice)
Douglas J. Simmons (admitted pro hac vice)
K&L Gates LLP
210 Sixth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Phone: (412) 355-6500
Fax: (412) 355-6501
Email: michael.lynch@klgates.com
paul.delvecchio@klgates.com
doug.simmons@klgates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff King County
ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Companies, North River Insurance Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company's (fka Stonewall Insurance Company) Motion Approving Settlement and Barring Claims (Dkt. 807), King County's claims against London Market Insurers with respect to their alleged insurance policies listed in Attachments C and E of King County's Fourth Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice, and without an award of fees or costs to either party.
This Order does not affect the remaining claims of King County in its Fourth Amended Complaint against any other defendant.
Source: Leagle
