Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Velasquez, 2:19-CR-0045-WFN-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20191204d43 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: SECOND PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: COMPUTER FORENSIC REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CONTRABAND WM. FREMMING NIELSEN , Senior District Judge . Before the Court is the Second Stipulation re: Computer Forensic Review Procedures for Child Pornography Contraband signed by Ann Wick, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Washington, and stipulated to by the Defendant, and Defendant's attorney, Sandy Baggett. The parties have stipulated to review procedures for child porno
More

SECOND PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: COMPUTER FORENSIC REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CONTRABAND

Before the Court is the Second Stipulation re: Computer Forensic Review Procedures for Child Pornography Contraband signed by Ann Wick, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Washington, and stipulated to by the Defendant, and Defendant's attorney, Sandy Baggett.

The parties have stipulated to review procedures for child pornography contraband. The Court has reviewed the file and Motion and is fully informed. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Second Stipulated Motion Re: Computer Forensic Review Procedures for Child Pornography Contraband, filed November 27, 2019, ECF No. 60, is GRANTED. The Court enters this Stipulation and further Orders:

The defense team shall not make, nor permit to be made, any copies of the child pornography contraband pursuant to this stipulation and order. The defense team agrees that it is forbidden from removing any contraband images from the Government reviewing facility. Defense expert will be allowed to compile a report (without contraband images/videos) documenting the examination on removable media if the case dictates.

If the defense expert makes any copies of the material contained on the extraction copy containing child pornography, HSI has the authority to search defense expert's copy for child pornography images.

The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and provide copies to counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer