Munning v. Nordstrom, Inc., C19-1810RSL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20191209c89
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on "Defendant Nordstrom, Inc.'s Motion to Waive Physical [Office] Requirement for Counsel Supporting the Application of P. Craig Cardon and Jay T. Ramsey to Appear Pro Hac Vice. " Dkt. # 10. The motion is DENIED. As is the norm in this district, counsel who are not admitted to practice before the Court must obtain permission to participate in the case,
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on "Defendant Nordstrom, Inc.'s Motion to Waive Physical [Office] Requirement for Counsel Supporting the Application of P. Craig Cardon and Jay T. Ramsey to Appear Pro Hac Vice. " Dkt. # 10. The motion is DENIED. As is the norm in this district, counsel who are not admitted to practice before the Court must obtain permission to participate in the case, ..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on "Defendant Nordstrom, Inc.'s Motion to Waive Physical [Office] Requirement for Counsel Supporting the Application of P. Craig Cardon and Jay T. Ramsey to Appear Pro Hac Vice." Dkt. # 10. The motion is DENIED. As is the norm in this district, counsel who are not admitted to practice before the Court must obtain permission to participate in the case, and their application must be supported by an attorney who both is admitted to the bar of this court and has a physical office within the geographic boundaries of the Western District of Washington. See State of Washington v. Trump, C17-0141JLR; LCR 83.1(d)(2). Although Robert J. Guite is a member of the Washington State Bar Association and therefore need not seek permission to appear before the Court (LCR 83.1(d)(1)), he does not maintain a physical office is this district and may not act as local counsel for others under LCR 83.1(d)(2). The Court declines to waive the requirements of LCR 83.1(d).
Source: Leagle
