Employee Painters' Trust v. Martin, C19-1153-JCC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20191219f74
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN C. COUGHENOUR , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13). Having thoroughly considered the motion and the relevant record, the Court FINDS as follows: 1. Defendants were properly served in this matter on or about August 8, 2019, and August 12, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7); 2. The Clerk entered orders of default against Defendants on September 26, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11); 3. Defendants have failed to appear or otherwi
Summary: ORDER JOHN C. COUGHENOUR , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13). Having thoroughly considered the motion and the relevant record, the Court FINDS as follows: 1. Defendants were properly served in this matter on or about August 8, 2019, and August 12, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7); 2. The Clerk entered orders of default against Defendants on September 26, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11); 3. Defendants have failed to appear or otherwis..
More
ORDER
JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13). Having thoroughly considered the motion and the relevant record, the Court FINDS as follows:
1. Defendants were properly served in this matter on or about August 8, 2019, and August 12, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7);
2. The Clerk entered orders of default against Defendants on September 26, 2019 (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11);
3. Defendants have failed to appear or otherwise defend in this action; and
4. The factors set forth in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986) support granting default judgment in Plaintiff's favor.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED in its entirety.
The Court ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED;
2. Defendants are ORDERED to pay Plaintiff a total of $230,405.64, consisting of:
a. $217,826.08 as restitution of losses sustained by Plaintiff plus the disgorgement of ill-gotten profits;
b. $5,909.42 in pre-judgment interest;
c. $5,145.00 in attorney fees; and
d. $1,525.14 for costs;
3. Post-judgment interest on the judgment is set at the rate fixed under 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and
4. This default judgment is deemed a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c) and there is no just reason for delay in entry of such judgment on
Plaintiff's claims herein.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
Source: Leagle