Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Huls v. Washington, C19-5420RBL. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20200108e49 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONALD B. LEIGHTON , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Christel's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 26]. Judge Christel recommends that the Court DENY Petitioner Huls' 2254 habeas petition [Dkt. # 1] without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. Huls has filed a familiar, generic objection to the R&R, which does not address the facts of this case or Magistrate Judge's reasoning. [Dkt. # 33]. (1) The Report and Recommendation i
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Christel's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 26]. Judge Christel recommends that the Court DENY Petitioner Huls' § 2254 habeas petition [Dkt. # 1] without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. Huls has filed a familiar, generic objection to the R&R, which does not address the facts of this case or Magistrate Judge's reasoning. [Dkt. # 33].

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (2) Petitioner's habeas Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any other pending motions are denied as moot. (3) The Court will NOT issue a Certificate of Appealability. (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for Respondent, and to the Hon. David W. Christel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer