Chen v. D'Amico, C16-1877JLR. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20200113f15
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND VACATING THE TRIAL DATE JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . On January 2, 2020, Defendants Kimberly Danner and Washington State Department of Social and Health Services ("DSHS") (collectively, "Defendants"), the remaining defendants in this case, filed a "statement" that the court construed as a motion for partial reconsideration of the court's December 20, 2020, summary judgment order. ( See MFR (Dkt. # 253); see also OSC (Dkt. # 254) at 2; MSJ Order (
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND VACATING THE TRIAL DATE JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . On January 2, 2020, Defendants Kimberly Danner and Washington State Department of Social and Health Services ("DSHS") (collectively, "Defendants"), the remaining defendants in this case, filed a "statement" that the court construed as a motion for partial reconsideration of the court's December 20, 2020, summary judgment order. ( See MFR (Dkt. # 253); see also OSC (Dkt. # 254) at 2; MSJ Order (D..
More
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND VACATING THE TRIAL DATE
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
On January 2, 2020, Defendants Kimberly Danner and Washington State Department of Social and Health Services ("DSHS") (collectively, "Defendants"), the remaining defendants in this case, filed a "statement" that the court construed as a motion for partial reconsideration of the court's December 20, 2020, summary judgment order. (See MFR (Dkt. # 253); see also OSC (Dkt. # 254) at 2; MSJ Order (Dkt. # 242).) As ordered by the court, Plaintiffs Susan Chen and Naixiang Lian filed responses on behalf of themselves and their minor children J.L. and L.L. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). (See Chen Resp. (Dkt. # 263); Lian Resp. (Dkt. # 266).) Defendants filed a reply on January 9, 2020. (Defs' Reply (Dkt. # 267).) No party requested oral argument. (See Chen Resp. at 1; Lian Resp. at 1; Defs' Reply at 1.)
The court has carefully considered Defendants' motion for reconsideration, the parties' briefing in support of and in opposition to the motion, the record, and the applicable law. Being fully informed, the court GRANTS Defendants' motion for partial reconsideration (Dkt. # 253), GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs' remaining claims in this case, and VACATES the trial date. A written order setting forth the court's analysis will follow.
Source: Leagle
