Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hurn v. Haynes, C19-1942-RAJ-MAT. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20200221g42 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MARY ALICE THEILER , Magistrate Judge . This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. This matter comes before the Court at the present time on respondent's motion for an extension of time to file an answer to petitioner's federal habeas petition. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. The Court, having reviewed respondent's motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) Respondent's motion for a
More

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter comes before the Court at the present time on respondent's motion for an extension of time to file an answer to petitioner's federal habeas petition. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. The Court, having reviewed respondent's motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows:

(1) Respondent's motion for an extension of time to file his answer to petitioner's federal habeas petition (Dkt. 8) is GRANTED. Respondent is directed to file his answer not later than March 2, 2020; and

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable Richard A. Jones.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer