Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yu v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, C18-5629 BHS. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20200228j71 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SHOW CAUSE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak's ("Amtrak") motion for summary judgment on punitive damages and Consumer Protection Act ("CPA") claim. Dkt. 13. On October 31, 2019, Amtrak filed the instant motion. Id. On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff Yu-Tsen Yu responded. Dkt. 15. On November 22, 20
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak's ("Amtrak") motion for summary judgment on punitive damages and Consumer Protection Act ("CPA") claim. Dkt. 13.

On October 31, 2019, Amtrak filed the instant motion. Id. On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff Yu-Tsen Yu responded. Dkt. 15. On November 22, 2019, Amtrak replied. Dkt. 17.

Upon review of the motion, the Court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part on the same grounds and for the same reasons set forth in Garza v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., C18-5106 BHS, 2019 WL 4849489 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 1, 2019) and related cases cited therein.

Regarding the remaining CPA claim, the Court will allow any party to show cause why the claim should not be severed and opened in a new case as was done in the related case of Cottrell v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., C18-0072-BHS, Dkt. 53 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 26, 2020). Any response may be filed no later than March 6, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer