Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

POLSKY v. VIRNICH, 800 N.W.2d 742 (2011)

Court: Supreme Court of Wisconsin Number: inwico20110302e16 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 02, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. 1 The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Polsky v. Virnich, 2010 WI App 20, 323 Wis.2d 811, 779 N.W.2d 712 , should be affirmed or reversed. Justice DAVID T. PROSSER, Justice PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK and Justice MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY and Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS would reverse. Justice ANNETTE K. ZIEGLER did not participate. 2 Accordingly, the de
More

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Polsky v. Virnich, 2010 WI App 20, 323 Wis.2d 811, 779 N.W.2d 712, should be affirmed or reversed. Justice DAVID T. PROSSER, Justice PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK and Justice MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY and Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS would reverse. Justice ANNETTE K. ZIEGLER did not participate.

¶ 2 Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer