Filed: Nov. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. WHEREAS this action is a putative shareholder class action brought by Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of certain former public shareholders of Renaissance Learning, Inc.; and WHEREAS federal jurisdiction originally rested on asserted violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78n(a), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. 240.14a-9; and
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. WHEREAS this action is a putative shareholder class action brought by Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of certain former public shareholders of Renaissance Learning, Inc.; and WHEREAS federal jurisdiction originally rested on asserted violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78n(a), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. 240.14a-9; and W..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
WHEREAS this action is a putative shareholder class action brought by Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of certain former public shareholders of Renaissance Learning, Inc.; and
WHEREAS federal jurisdiction originally rested on asserted violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9; and
WHEREAS Plaintiffs deleted these claims in their First Amended Class Action Complaint, thereby raising questions as to the continuing propriety of litigating this case in federal court; and
WHEREAS a substantially similar action on behalf of the same proposed class is pending in the Circuit Court of Wood County, Wisconsin (the "State Action"); and
WHEREAS the State Action was commenced prior to the present action, making it the first filed action; and
WHEREAS the parties agree that two essentially identical actions on behalf of the same putative class should not proceed simultaneously in two separate courts; and
WHEREAS the parties agree that the pendency of the State Action will protect any claims putative class members may have; and
WHEREAS because the parties are stipulating to dismissal of the present action without prejudice, the parties agree that notice to putative class members is not required by Fed. R. Civ. P.23(e),
NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated as follows, subject to approval of the Court:
1. This action is dismissed without prejudice and with all parties to bear their own fees and costs. No consideration has been furnished or promised to Plaintiffs or their counsel for the dismissal of this action.
2. Notice to the putative class shall not be required or given both because the dismissal is without prejudice and because putative class members are protected by the continued pendency of the State Action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
ORDER
Having read the above stipulation and approving thereof, it is ORDERED:
1. This action is dismissed without prejudice and with all parties to bear their own fees and costs.