J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
Once again, the Court is charged with the unenviable task of deciding yet another in an exceptionally long line of Social Security cases run amok. This line of cases — the result of what might be charitably described as a wholly dysfunctional administrative process within the Social Security Administration — has continued to grow, bringing with it a skyrocketing number of remands. Moreover, the shortcomings associated with the administrative process are all too often exacerbated by the United States Attorney's submissions to the Court, which give every appearance of simply parroting the client agency's words without any serious independent legal analysis or thoughtful review. To be sure, this is hardly an effective strategy to defend the indefensible.
In the end, perhaps the Court's concerns are best captured in the relevant historical data associated with Social Security cases filed in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, dating back to 2009.
As those figures show, both the number of filings and the rate of remand continue to rise.
Accompanying that rise has been a deluge of taxpayer dollars paid out in the form of attorneys' fees to counsel for prevailing plaintiffs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). These fees totaled $371,483 for 2009 cases; $392,797 for 2010 cases; $456,501.78 for the concluded 2011 cases; and $66,027 for the concluded 2012 cases. In the aggregate, to date these EAJA fees amount to 1.3 million dollars.
But that amount does not even begin to cover all of the expenses associated with dealing with these Social Security appeals. As if the attorneys' fees were not enough, the government — again through taxpayer dollars — must also cover the salaries and associated administrative expenses of the court, the court's staff, and the government's lawyers, all of whom have roles in the appeal process. The pre-appeal administrative process entails its own costs, including the salaries and expenses of the many administrative law judges and other staff tasked with various roles in making the initial determination of eligibility for Social Security benefits.
It does not end there, for beyond the matter of the staggering economic costs, there is also the matter of the personal
Now on to the case at hand. The plaintiff in this matter, Jennifer Freismuth, filed her Social Security appeal on February 3, 2012. (Docket #1). In it, she challenges Administrative Law Judge Mary Everstine's finding that she was not disabled during the relevant time period in question. (Docket # 1). The parties have fully briefed the matter, and it is now ripe for decision. (Docket # 7, # 12, # 13). As the reader may have intuited from the foregoing discussion, the Court finds that ALJ Everstine erred in reaching her decision, and the Court must, accordingly, vacate and remand this matter.
Due to the significant volume of medical evidence in this case, as well as the complicated procedural history, the Court will address the background in two separate sections. In order to provide context for the basis of the plaintiff's disability claims, the Court will first address the procedural history followed by a discussion of the relevant evidence.
Ms. Freismuth filed her application for SSD benefits on November 22, 2004, alleging that she had been disabled since October 19, 2001.
Ms. Freismuth requested an ALJ hearing on April 4, 2006, and eventually appeared before ALJ John Moreen on September 5, 2008. (Tr. 74, 561-84). ALJ Moreen determined that Ms. Freismuth could perform a significant number of light jobs and, therefore, determined that she was not disabled. (Tr. 38-55).
The Appeals Council reviewed ALJ Moreen's determination, at Ms. Freismuth's request, and on December 16, 2009, remanded the matter for a new ALJ hearing and decision. (Tr. 30-32).
Pursuant to that remand, ALJ Everstine conducted a second ALJ hearing on August 23, 2010. (Tr. 585-608). Ms. Freismuth testified at that hearing, as did vocational expert Sharon Spaventa. (Tr. 585-608).
After taking that testimony and examining the evidence of record, ALJ Everstine determined that, as of Ms. Freismuth's date last insured (March 31, 2007), Ms. Freismuth could still perform a significant number of light jobs and therefore was not disabled. (Tr. 10-22). The ALJ's decision is discussed further in Part 1.3 of this Order.
Ms. Freismuth requested review of ALJ Everstine's decision, but on December 6, 2011, the Appeals Council declined to review the matter. (Tr. 4-6). The decision of ALJ Everstine
Ms. Freismuth's alleged disability in this matter occurred over a long period of time, extending past her March 31, 2007, date last insured. Thus, the Court will separate the medical evidence occurring before March 31, 2007, and that occurring afterwards, as one of the issues in this case revolves around the date last insured. Furthermore, in each time period, Ms. Freismuth received both physiological and psychological treatment.
Ms. Freismuth's medical problems at issue in this case began in October of 2000. (Tr. 295). At that time, she began to complain of neck pain, hearing loss, and dizziness; a subsequent medical test indicated dysfunction involving her saccade eye movement control system. (Tr. 295).
On October 16, 2000, Ms. Freismuth began to see Dr. M.A. Strigenz, who conducted an MRI showing abnormalities and trauma in Ms. Freismuth's brain. (Tr. 194-95, 281). Dr. Strigenz prescribed Valium and Claritin to Ms. Freismuth, but Ms. Freismuth's hearing loss and balance problems continued. (Tr. 280-81).
Thus, on December 21, 2000, Dr. Strigenz performed surgery on Ms. Freismuth's right ear; then, on July 19, 2001, Dr. Phillip Wackym performed an additional ear surgery. (Tr. 169-60, 191-92). While these surgeries provided Ms. Freismuth some temporary relief, her hearing did not improve entirely. (Tr. 161, 276-77). Dr. Wackym determined that further surgery would not be useful, and thus recommended that Ms. Freismuth use a hearing aid. (Tr. 161).
Then, several years later, on November 5, 2004, Ms. Freismuth returned to Dr. Strigenz. (Tr. 263). At that time, she complained of continuing imbalance, vertigo, and nausea, for which Dr. Strigenz prescribed Xanax and Allegra. (Tr. 263). Nonetheless, Ms. Freismuth's hearing loss and dizziness problems continued into 2005 and 2007, and were noted by Dr. Strigenz at follow-up appointments in those years. (Tr. 228-33, 235-38).
Also in November of 2004, Ms. Freismuth began to see Dr. Nancy Goranson for psychological treatment. (Tr. 174-79). Dr. Goranson diagnosed major depressive disorder and recommended therapy and use of Lexapro. (Tr. 178-79). Dr. Goranson completed a questionnaire at the Social Security Administration's request on February 1, 2005; at that time, Dr. Goranson noted that Ms. Freismuth's depressive disorder had continued for approximately four years. (Tr. 171-73). Dr. Goranson's diagnosis of major depressive disorder was confirmed by a second treating doctor, Dr. Thomas Altepeter, on January 16, 2007.
Throughout this period, Ms. Freismuth had several other doctors, as well, treating her brain problems. On December 21, 2004, Dr. Kenneth Viste informed the Social Security Administration that Ms. Freismuth received regular treatment for seizure disorder and depression. (Tr. 306). On July 5, 2005, Dr. Lori Pierquet evaluated Ms. Freismuth at the request of the Social Security Administration, and reported major depression, seizure disorder, hearing problems, vertigo, and several other impairments; from those symptoms,
As to Ms. Freismuth's physical well-being, Dr. Gina Everson took over treatment in October of 2005. (Tr. 253). Ms. Freismuth complained of the following problems: continued hearing loss, regular headaches, neck pain, left hand pain, fatigue, and vertigo (the latter as a result of taking her antibiotic medications). (Tr. 422). At that time, Dr. Everson diagnosed a right trapezius strain, headaches, tenosynovitis, vertigo, seizures, and fatigue. (Tr. 254). Dr. Everson prescribed naproxen to help with Ms. Freismuth's trapezius strain. (Tr. 254). At Ms. Freismuth's October 26, 2005 follow-up appointment, Dr. Everson noted Ms. Freismuth's progress. There was no improvement in Ms. Freismuth's trapezius strain from taking the Naproxen. (Tr. 252).
Ms. Freismuth returned to Dr. Everson on December 28, 2007, complaining of aches and fatigue. (Tr. 413). Dr. Everson ordered an MRI of Ms. Freismuth and, in January of 2008, determined that Ms. Freismuth was suffering from mild degenerative disease in her back. (Tr. 410-11). In the same month, Dr. Everson diagnosed Ms. Freismuth with diffuse myalgias consistent with fibromyalgia, and stated that depression likely contributed to those symptoms; Dr. Everson prescribed Trazodone and Flexeril to Ms. Freismuth, referred her to physical therapy, and suggested that she seek psychiatric treatment. (Tr. 392, 548).
Ms. Freismuth then began seeing additional doctors for both sleep difficulties and fibromyalgia. In February of 2008, Ms. Freismuth began to see Dr. Elliot Phillips, a sleep specialist. (Tr. 381). Over the course of several meetings, Dr. Phillips diagnosed Ms. Freismuth with several sleep-related disorders and prescribed both Provigil and Adderall. (Tr. 374, 381-82, 400-01, 404, 427, 433-40). Also, in March of 2008, Dr. Elizabeth Bensen began to treat Ms. Freismuth for fibromyalgia-related symptoms. (Tr. 541). Dr. Bensen diagnosed generalized pain with mood symptoms and advised that Ms. Freismuth discontinue her physical therapy. (Tr. 541). Eventually, in July of 2008, Dr. Bensen prescribed Celebrex to treat Ms. Freismuth's pain; two months later, Ms. Freismuth reported that Celebrex was not effective. (Tr. 535, 537).
In September of 2008, Drs. Phillips, Bensen, and Everson evaluated Ms. Freismuth's ability to work, and determined that Ms. Freismuth would likely have extreme difficulty finding work. (Tr. 435-39, 457, 535). Due to Ms. Freismuth's sleep problems, Dr. Phillips estimated that she would need hourly 15- to 30-minute breaks during an 8-hour day, and that she would typically be absent from work more than three times per month. (Tr. 439). In additional evaluations, Drs. Phillips and Everson found that Ms. Freismuth suffered from multiple impairments that caused interrelated physical and mental problems that would significantly impair her ability to work. (Tr. 441-45, 446-53).
Ms. Freismuth's pain and sleeping problems continued through 2010, and throughout that time Ms. Freismuth continued to visit Dr. Everson. (Tr. 455, 483, 548-50). In 2010, Dr. Everson stated that Ms.
Ms. Freismuth testified before the ALJ and stated that she worked for several years as an administrative assistant, but was permanently laid off from her job in 2001, around the onset of her disability. (Tr. 567-68). After being laid off, Ms. Freismuth found another job, but was laid off after three weeks, because the company found that she could not learn the work requirements quickly enough. (Tr. 567). Thus, Ms. Freismuth filed for disability benefits, alleging that she suffered from: problems with memory, concentration, and following written instructions; fibromyalgia; narcolepsy; seizures; hearing loss; and vertigo. (Tr. 93-95, 567-69, 571-72, 592). Ms. Freismuth also testified more specifically that she had dizziness with standing or walking (but could walk for ten to fifteen minutes or sit for thirty minutes), that she could lift and carry a twenty-pound object a short distance, that she could sit for thirty minutes but would be restless during that period, and that she had lost her hearing in her right ear. (Tr. 567-69, 571-72, 592). Ms. Freismuth states that she does most of the housework (excepting vacuuming or lifting-related tasks such as laundry) and grocery shopping. (Tr. 573, 578).
The vocational expert, Ms. Saventa, then testified before the ALJ. (Tr. 603-08). The ALJ posed a hypothetical to Ms. Saventa, asking how many jobs would be available to an individual with Ms. Freismuth's limitations and qualifications. (Tr. 603-04). Specifically, the ALJ noted that the hypothetical person would have Ms. Freismuth's educational background and work experience. (Tr. 603-04). The ALJ also limited the hypothetical person's abilities further, to include only simple and repetitive tasks requiring light work, with only occasional stooping, crouching or crawling; without any climbing of ladders, balancing, working from unprotected heights, or operating hazardous machinery; and not requiring excellent hearing. (Tr. 603-04). Taking all of those qualifications and limitations into account, the vocational expert determined that the hypothetical person could likely perform 8,200 jobs in the region as a marker and 5,200 jobs in the region as a hotel room cleaner. (Tr. 604).
Ms. Freismuth's representative then questioned the vocational expert as to whether such hypothetical person would be able to work those jobs if he or she would be likely to miss work three times each month. (Tr. 604-05). The representative also asked whether the person would be able to perform those jobs if he or she required unscheduled breaks of thirty to forty minutes. (Tr. 605). As to both questions, the vocational expert conceded that the hypothetical person could not work the marker or cleaner jobs if either of the additional limitations were imposed. (Tr. 604-05).
Having considered the above-discussed evidence and testimony of the parties, the ALJ made several determinations. First, the ALJ determined that Ms. Freismuth had not performed substantial gainful activity since her onset date, and that her date last insured was March 31, 2007. (Tr. 15). Second, the ALJ identified several severe mental and physical impairments, including hearing loss, vertigo, major depressive disorder, head trauma with controlled seizures, and degenerative disc disease of the spine. (Tr. 15-16). Third, the ALJ considered whether Ms. Freismuth suffered from any marked limitations of criteria in Listing 12.04 (affective disorders); she determined that Ms. Freismuth
Next, and most importantly for this review, the ALJ determined that, as of the March 31, 2007, date last insured, Ms. Freismuth retained the residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform light work with a substantial number of limitations.
Based on these determinations, the ALJ found that Ms. Freismuth's severe impairments would prevent her from performing her past relevant work. (Tr. 21).
Nonetheless, the ALJ determined that Ms. Freismuth retained the RFC to perform a significant number of other light jobs, and therefore was not disabled. (Tr. 21).
Ms. Freismuth offers the Court several reasons to overturn the ALJ's decision. First, she argues that the ALJ did not accord appropriate weight to the medical evidence in this case. (Pl.'s Br. 17-21). Second, Ms. Freismuth takes issue with the ALJ's determination that Ms. Freismuth's testimony lacked credibility. (Pl.'s Br. 21-24). Finally, she alleges that the testimony of the vocational expert was flawed. (Pl.'s Br. 24-25). If the Court finds that any one of those alleged errors is present in the ALJ's decision, the Court must reverse that decision.
Despite having grouped them all into one section of her brief, Ms. Freismuth has made several distinct arguments for reversal based on medical evidence. She first alleges error in the weight accorded to Dr. Everson's medical opinion. (Pl.'s Br. 17-19). Next, she argues that the ALJ erred by failing to accord weight to Dr. Phillips' opinion. (Pl.'s Br. 19-20). And, finally, Ms. Freismuth points out that the ALJ's RFC determination was not based upon a medical opinion, and states that such failure constitutes error. (Pl.'s Br. 20-21).
"A treating physician's opinion that is consistent with the record is generally entitled to `controlling weight.' ... An ALJ who chooses to reject a treating physician's opinion must provide a sound explanation for the rejection." Jelinek v.
Here, the ALJ stated that she gave little weight to Dr. Everson's medical opinions. (Tr. 20). Specifically, the ALJ noted that Ms. Freismuth only visited Dr. Everson twice before her March 31, 2007, date last insured, and that in those two visits Ms. Freismuth presented very mild impairments. (Tr. 20-21). Furthermore, the ALJ disregarded all of Dr. Everson's opinions occurring after the date last insured, holding that those opinions did not relate to the insured period. (Tr. 20-21).
The ALJ erred in rejecting Dr. Everson's post-date last insured opinions. The Appeals Council remanded the first ALJ decision with specific instructions to consider a Multiple Impairment Questionnaire that was submitted by Dr. Everson on October 2, 2008. (Tr. 31). The Appeals Council also demanded that the ALJ obtain additional medical evidence, including statements from medical sources, regarding Ms. Freismuth's impairments. (Tr. 31-32). Those instructions make clear that the Appeals Council considered evidence established after the date last insured to be relevant to the ALJ's determination. Furthermore, as a simple matter of logic, even if medical evidence (such as the post-date last insured opinions of Dr. Everson) did not exist at the date last insured, that fact standing alone does not mean that such evidence lacks probative value as to a plaintiff's pre-date last insured impairments. See, e.g., Estok v. Apfel, 152 F.3d 636, 640 (7th Cir.1998) (stating that retrospective medical opinions should be considered if corroborated with evidence contemporaneous to the eligible period), Allord v. Barnhart, 455 F.3d 818, 822 (7th Cir.2006). For these reasons, the Court must conclude that the ALJ failed to provide an adequate explanation for rejecting Dr. Everson's post-date last insured opinions. The Court is thus obliged to find that the ALJ erred in that respect.
As to the ALJ's discounting the weight afforded to Dr. Everson's predate last insured opinions, the Court finds that such action was appropriate and supported by a sound explanation. In that respect, the ALJ offered substantial reasons for discounting the weight of those opinions, such as the fact that Ms. Freismuth's symptoms were mild and seemed to be improving and also that Dr. Everson saw Ms. Freismuth only twice in the relevant time period. (Tr. 20-21). Dr. Everson's pre-date last insured opinions were based on a mere two visits within the same month, during which time the patient's health was in flux-hardly a strong baseline from which to determine Ms. Freismuth's state of health. Thus, the Court must conclude that the ALJ provided a firm rationale for discounting those pre-date last insured opinions. Therefore, such action was not in error.
The ALJ discarded Dr. Phillips' medical opinions entirely, which was an error. So long as medical opinions from treating physicians are corroborated by evidence from the insured period, they should be given weight, even if they were not rendered before the date last insured. Estok, 152 F.3d at 640.
Dr. Phillips' opinions are consistent with evidence of fatigue existing before the date last insured, and therefore should have been considered by the ALJ. Id. Dr. Everson assessed Ms. Freismuth and noted fatigue in October of 2005.
Ms. Freismuth's last argument regarding the ALJ's consideration of the medical evidence relates to the ALJ's RFC determination: Ms. Freismuth alleges that the ALJ did not base that determination on any medical opinion in the record. (Pl.'s Br. 20).
Indeed, an ALJ cannot reject every medical opinion in a given record in reaching an RFC determination. Suide v. Astrue, 371 Fed.Appx. 684 (7th Cir.2010) (establishing that an ALJ may not substitute his or her lay opinion for all other medical sources in record), Eakin v. Astrue, 432 Fed.Appx. 607 (7th Cir.2011).
Here, the ALJ did just that — she reached an RFC determination that is not wholly based on any medical opinion in the record. The Commissioner argues that the ALJ's RFC determination is consistent with the opinion of state agency physician Dr. Baumblatt (Def.'s Br. 13), but then goes on to acknowledge that the RFC is only "generally" consistent with Dr. Baumblatt's less restrictive determination that Ms. Freismuth could perform light work. (Tr. 216-23). In the Court's opinion, it seems that the ALJ merely split the difference between Dr. Baumblatt's opinion and the plethora of medical evidence discussed above that documents Ms. Freismuth's multiple impairments. The ALJ addressed only Dr. Everson's medical opinions in detail before reaching the RFC determination; little other medical evidence was discussed. Given the large amount of evidence available and the lack of adequate discussion of a large portion of that evidence, the Court must conclude that the ALJ substituted her opinion for those of the other medical sources in the record. Such substitution constitutes reversible error. Suide, 371 Fed.Appx. 684.
In evaluating a claimant's testimony regarding pain and other subjective matters, an ALJ must follow a two-step process: first, the ALJ must determine whether the complained-of symptoms are consistent with objective medical evidence in the record; and, second, the ALJ must evaluate the claimant's credibility regarding the specific contours of that pain (such as intensity, persistence, and effects). Social Security Ruling 96-7p (interpreting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529).
Here, there is no question that the ALJ completed the first of those steps — the ALJ stated that the objective evidence "could reasonably be expected to cause the alleged symptoms." (Tr. 18).
At the second step of the evaluation, though, the ALJ erred. To begin, the ALJ used inappropriate language at that step in determining that Ms. Freismuth's statements were not credible to the extent they were inconsistent with the RFC. The exact language that the ALJ used has been roundly criticized by the Seventh Circuit as meaningless boilerplate. See, e.g., Bjornson v. Astrue, 671 F.3d 640, 645-647 (7th Cir.2012).
Furthermore, even disregarding that meaningless language, the ALJ's credibility determination here was deeply flawed. For example, the ALJ found it very relevant that Ms. Freismuth had worked for several years after a 1992 car crash before becoming disabled, and that Ms. Freismuth had been laid off (as opposed to having left due to her condition) from her job. (Tr. 19). Yet, the ALJ neglected to mention that Ms. Freismuth had been in a
Given those errors, as well as the ALJ's use of disfavored language, the Court must conclude that the ALJ erred in making her credibility determination.
Ms. Freismuth's final argument centers around the hypothetical questions posed by the ALJ to the vocational expert to determine Ms. Freismuth's ability to work. (Pl.'s Br. 24-25). On this point, Ms. Freismuth argues that the ALJ presented the vocational expert with a hypothetical that did not take all of the medical evidence into consideration. (Pl.'s Br. 24-25). The Court agrees.
An ALJ's hypotheticals to a vocational expert must take into account all of a claimant's limitations. Stewart v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 679, 684 (7th Cir.2009).
Here, the ALJ's hypothetical failed to include limitations for frequent breaks, frequent absences, and mental limitations. (Tr. 603-08). There are numerous medical opinions in the record in this matter, practically all of which acknowledge that Ms. Freismuth would need frequent breaks. (Tr. 201, 438-39, 444, 451-52). And, while the ALJ failed to include a frequent-break limitation in his hypothetical questions, the VE testified (pursuant to one of Ms. Freismuth's questions) that no jobs would exist for an individual needing to take frequent breaks, as would likely be required in Ms. Freismuth's case. There is also a significant bundle of evidence concerning Ms. Freismuth's mental limitations in concentration, persistence, and pace, as well as in daily living and social functioning; the ALJ included only a limitation that Ms. Freismuth be limited to simple and repetitive tasks. (Tr. 17, 603). From these problems, it is quite clear to the Court that the ALJ simply disregarded much of the record in forming her hypothetical questions.
Thus, given that the ALJ ignored many of Ms. Freismuth's limitations, the Court is obliged to determine that her decision was in error. Stewart, 561 F.3d at 684.
This case is not a close one. Whereas Social Security appeals often exist in a grey area, with much of an ALJ's decision correct with some minor errors, here the ALJ's decision is absolutely riddled with errors. In reality, the Court has little idea as to why the Commissioner chose to defend this case on appeal. Not only were there multiple problems with the ALJ's decision that were readily apparent to the Court, but it also appears that the Commissioner's attorneys elected to spend very little time and effort writing the brief in defense of the ALJ's decision. The Commissioner's brief includes an error of fact
If the Commissioner is not going to put forth an adequate effort to defend an ALJ's decisions, why defend them at all? To the Court it is quite apparent that a thorough early evaluation by the Commissioner would have disclosed that this case should have never proceeded to the point of formal briefing, given the glaring errors in the ALJ's decision. Frankly, with a very full case load, the Court finds it insulting to be continually called upon to review these cases, when the Commissioner's counsel can neither appropriately screen them nor adequately brief them. As earlier noted in this decision, reversals of ALJ determinations in Social Security cases have absolutely skyrocketed. The record in this case amply demonstrates why: the Commissioner continues to engage in the Sisyphean task of defending a significant number of ALJ decisions, without first giving appropriate consideration to the merits of such defenses. The Court fully expects that this untenable situation will be remedied post haste, and in a manner that insures that both the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney's office devote their respective resources to defending ALJ decisions that truly have merit. If not — at the risk of stating the obvious — they will soon find themselves in very deep trouble.
Given the significant errors in the ALJ's decision, as noted above, the Court is obliged to vacate the decision of the ALJ and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Accordingly,
The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
2009 Social Security Cases Date Case No./Judge Case Title Disposition Disp. Attorneys' Filed Date Fees/Costs 03/06/06 06-CV-0273-CNC Nelms v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 03/31/09 $31,191.82/IFP 03/27/09 09/01/06 06-CV-0933-JPS McKay v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 12/08/10 $11,310.30/IFP 04/06/09 04/01/08 08-CV-0284-LA Sucharski v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/25/09 $10,248.25/$350.00 02/10/09 05/21/08 08-CV-0450-RTR Ross v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 09/22/09 $11,976.80/IFP 09/15/09 01/06/09 09-CV-0024-WCG Baker v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/26/09 None 01/08/09 09-CV-0036-LA Christel v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/24/09 $3,000.00/IFP 01/08/09 09-CV-0041-JPS Smith v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/02/10 $7,194.88/$350.00 01/13/09 09-CV-0055-CNC Nieves Rivera v. Astrue Affirmed 12/20/10 N/A 01/14/09 09-CV-0060-LA Mattison v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/21/09 Motion Denied/$350.00 01/14/09 09-CV-0061-RTR Jones v. Astrue Affirmed 07/17/09 N/A 01/16/09 09-CV-0072-AEG Thao v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/17/09 $4,200.00/IFP 02/09/09 09-CV-0130-LA Lopez v. Astrue Dismissed 11/30/09 IFP/Pro se 02/13/09 09-CV-0147-CNC McCormick v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/15/09 $10,870.25/$350.00 02/19/09 09-CV-0173-RTR Segalle v. Astrue Remanded 02/04/10 $3,524.41/IFP 02/20/09 09-CV-0178-JPS Spiva v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 02/14/11 $17,408.22/$677.99 01/28/11 02/25/09 09-CV-0203-LA Joseph v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/28/09 $3,534.00/IFP 02/27/09 09-CV-0212-LA Thompson v. Astrue Dismissed 03/30/10 IFP/Pro se Ratulowski v. Commissioner Social 03/10/09 09-CV-0270-AEG Security Administration Affirmed 10/19/09 N/A 03/12/09 09-CV-0281-RTR Corson v. Astrue Affirmed 02/10/10 N/A 03/23/09 09-CV-0313-WEC Hudson v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/25/10 $11,344.60 04/03/09 09-CV-0358-JPS Roquemore v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/10/10 $5,300.00/IFP 04/09/09 09-CV-0367-WCG Dobrecevich-Voelkel v. Remanded 03/03/11 $7,386.65/IFP 01/26/10 Astrue 04/10/09 09-CV-0372-JPS Powell v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/08/09 $5,250.00/IFP 04/15/09 09-CV-0392-LA Ramos v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 11/27/09 $8,431.50/IFP 05/06/09 09-CV-0464-LA Lunsford v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 04/02/10 $6,750.00 05/08/09 09-CV-0472-JPS Washington v. Astrue Affirmed 08/19/10 N/A 05/12/09 09-CV-0483-LA Stitch v. Astrue Affirmed 01/31/10 N/A 05/13/09 09-CV-0485-CNC Emanuele v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/17/11 IFP/Pro se 05/22/09 09-CV-0523-WCG Kemp v. Astrue Affirmed 09/30/10 N/A 05/27/09 09-CV-0534-WCG Vander Linden v. Commissioner Reversed/Remanded 04/07/10 $6,000.00/IFP Social Security Adminstration 05/28/09 09-CV-0537-CNC Reynolds v. Astrue Remanded 07/21/10 $5,500.00/$350.00 06/01/09 09-CV-0547-JPS Phillips v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 08/10/11 $5,500.00 11/23/10 06/04/09 09-CV-0559-WCG Leverance v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 09/20/10 IFP/Pro se 06/04/09 09-CV-0560-CNC Vander Meulen v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/13/12 $6,478.75/IFP 06/11/09 09-CV-0582-RTR Krucky v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/23/09 $5,394.81/IFP
06/16/09 09-CV-0594-PJG O'Brien v. Astrue Affirmed 09/03/10 N/A 06/19/09 09-CV-0615-LA Flores v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 10/19/09 None 06/24/09 09-CV-0626-RTR Boldon v. Astrue Affirmed 01/22/10 N/A 06/26/09 09-CV-0629-JPS Carr v. Astrue Affirmed 07/30/10 N/A 07/07/09 09-CV-0665-CNC Winters v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/08/10 $5,685.64/IFP 07/14/09 09-CV-0688-PJG Banks v. Astrue Remanded 09/27/10 $4,500.00/IFP 07/16/09 09-CV-0695-RTR McDonald v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/08/10 None 07/22/09 09-CV-0717-LA Jones v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/23/10 $5,197.50/IFP 07/22/09 09-CV-0719-PJG Le Vaughn v. Astrue Remanded 09/30/10 $2,874.00/$350.00 07/23/09 09-CV-0721-RTR Larson v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/16/10 $4,638.62 07/24/09 09-CV-0727-RTR Zirzow v. Astrue Remanded 01/22/10 $7,713.0/IFP 08/03/09 09-CV-0754-RTR Mercier v. Astrue Remanded 02/03/10 $5,300.00/IFP 08/11/09 09-CV-0773-RTR Jemison v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/19/10 $8,397.00/IFP 08/13/09 09-CV-0784-JPS Mott v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 03/09/11 $12,725.93/$160.99 03/02/11 08/14/09 09-CV-0791-CNC Lengling v. Astrue Dismissed on Government's Motion 12/10/10 IFP/Pro se 08/17/09 09-CV-0798-JPS Alicea v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 10/28/09 IFP/Pro se 08/19/09 09-CV-0803-JPS Troop v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 09/24/10 $5,877.50/IFP 08/21/09 09-CV-0812-JPS Thompson v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 07/16/10 None 09/10/09 09-CV-0868-CNC Jones v. Astrue Affirmed 10/31/11 N/A 09/10/09 09-CV-0874-RTR Walker v. Astrue Remanded 05/19/10 $5,100.00/IFP 09/11/09 09-CV-0876-RTR Lashley v. Astrue Dismissed on Government's Motion 04/14/10 IFP/Pro se 09/15/09 09-CV-0888-CNC Kampe v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/31/12 $6,056.77/$350.00 09/16/09 09-CV-0893-WCG Harder v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 05/21/10 $6,350.00 09/17/09 09-CV-0897-WCG Birling v. Social Security Stayed pending plaintiff's release from 08/16/10 N/A Administration prison 09/17/09 09-CV-0900-WEC Woods v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/29/10 $4,264.13/IFP 09/21/09 09-CV-0912-LA Weber v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/11/10 $5,700.00/IFP 09/21/09 09-CV-0914-WEC Rodriguez v. Astrue Affirmed 09/01/10 N/A 09/23/09 09-CV-0918-PJG Carr v. Astrue Affirmed 09/23/10 N/A 09/29/09 09-CV-0938-PJG Gallagher v. Astrue Affirmed 09/30/10 N/A 09/30/09 09-CV-0947-CNC Freeman v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/16/11 $17,068.37/$350.00 10/02/09 09-CV-0953-JPS Jefferson v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 08/03/10 $7,047.50/IFP 10/13/09 09-CV-0978-CNC Watts v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 05/07/10 $1,900.00 10/19/09 09-CV-0990-WCG Kirk v. Astrue Affirmed 12/02/10 N/A 10/28/09 09-CV-1020-JPS Caraballo v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/07/11 Motion for Fees Denied 11/04/09 09-CV-1040-WEC Wright v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/12/11 $6,900.00 11/12/09 09-CV-1067-AEG Levins v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/10/10 $13,158.75/IFP 11/12/09 09-CV-1068-PJG Holzem v. Astrue Remanded 03/15/11 $6,645.75/IFP 11/17/09 09-CV-1084-WCG Haase v. Astrue Affirmed 08/27/10 N/A 11/24/09 09-CV-1101-LA Kadletz v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/26/10 $8,571.00/IFP
12/03/09 09-CV-1120-AEG Schott v. Astrue Remanded on Parties Joint Motion 03/18/10 None 12/07/09 09-CV-1128-WCG Vanderloop v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 11/15/10 $7,000.00 12/21/09 09-CV-1163-WCG Monroe v. Astrue Remanded 03/09/11 $8,564.48/$435.02 12/31/09 09-CV-1197-WCG Robinson v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 11/15/11 $16,452.00/$135.10 10/13/11
2010 Social Security Cases Date Case No./Judge Case Title Disposition Disp. Attorneys' Filed Date Fees/Costs 11/05/07 07-CV-0983-CNC Bell v. Astrue Affirmed 04/21/11 N/A 02/24/10 06/15/06 06-CV-0697-RTR Bauer v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 04/26/10 $30,746.7/$412.08 04/12/10 12/03/07 07-CV-1079-JPS D.R v. Astrue Dismissed on Government's Motion 04/21/11 IFP/Pro se 10/14/10 01/14/10 10-CV-0037-RTR Clark v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/27/10 $5,700.00/IFP 01/21/10 10-CV-0053-LA Nobel v. Astrue Dismissed 08/04/10 IFP/Pro se 07/19/10 10-CV-0602-RTR Burdick v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/31/11 $7,250.25/IFP 02/02/10 10-CV-0088-RTR Bates v. Astrue Affirmed 07/21/10 N/A 02/03/10 10-CV-0092-WCG Borland v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/17/10 $6,000.00/$463.91 02/10/10 10-CV-0119-LA Hadley v. Astrue Affirmed 08/26/10 N/A 03/03/10 10-CV-0175-WCG Su Nemun v. Astrue Remanded 03/24/11 $8,066.48/IFP 03/12/10 10-CV-0212-WEC McLaughlin v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 02/09/11 $8,744.29/IFP 03/13/10 10-CV-0213-WEC Anderson v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/16/10 $5,440.00/IFP 03/22/10 10-CV-0240-LA Wiersma v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/08/10 $7,242.00/$350.00 03/24/10 10-CV-0246-WEC Kott v. Astrue Affirmed 03/07/11 N/A 03/24/10 10-CV-0248-RTR Bufford v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 11/17/10 $7,500.00/IFP 03/30/10 10-CV-0272-JPS Earl v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/17/11 $6,514.32/IFP 04/07/10 10-CV-0290-CNC Costello v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/04/10 $4,781.88/IFP 04/20/10 10-CV-0338-JPS Blanchard v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/07/11 $7,167.66/IFP 04/23/10 10-CV-0353-LA Nash v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/20/11 $8,488.00/IFP 04/27/10 10-CV-0360-RTR Lowe v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 11/19/10 $6,200.00/IFP 04/28/10 10-CV-0365-LA McGee v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/27/11 $6,406.00/IFP 04/30/10 10-CV-0376-RTR Frischmann v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/12/10 $5,150.00/IFP 05/03/10 10-CV-0380-AEG Trossen v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/06/10 $5,865.00/$350.00 05/14/10 10-CV-0420-CNC Drake v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/15/11 $7,200.00/IFP 05/19/10 10-CV-0431-LA Graham v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/23/10 $4,259.05/IFP 05/24/10 10-CV-0450-WEC Tritz v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/24/11 $6,629.00/$350.00 05/25/10 10-CV-0451-LA Sherrod v. Astrue Affirmed 01/25/11 N/A 05/26/10 10-CV-0454-WCG Varga v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 02/02/11 $7,975.71/$350.00 05/27/10 10-CV-0457-WCG Matzke v. Astrue Remanded 09/07/11 None 05/27/10 10-CV-0458-LA Turner v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/05/11 $4,503.66/IFP 05/28/10 10-CV-0461-WEC McNeil v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/18/10 $4,400.00/IFP 06/08/10 10-CV-0478-AEG Terlecki v. Astrue Affirmed 12/20/10 N/A 06/08/10 10-CV-0480-PJG Cherry v. Astrue Dismissed 11/10/10 IFP/Pro se 06/08/10 10-CV-0481-PJG Colister v. Astrue Remanded 03/30/12 $7,000.00/IFP 06/16/10 10-CV-0506-WEC Bilello v. Astrue Dismissed on Government's Motion 07/08/11 IFP/Pro se 06/16/10 10-CV-0507-AEG Steffen v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 04/26/11 $1,904.76
06/17/10 10-CV-0509-LA Starting v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/20/10 $6,885.25/$350.00 06/22/10 10-CV-0518-WEC Maki v. Astrue Affirmed 09/12/11 N/A 06/25/10 10-CV-0527-PJG S v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/06/11 $4,507.48/$100.71 07/02/10 10-CV-0547-PJG Burr v. Astrue Affirmed 08/15/11 N/A 07/02/10 10-CV-0548-AEG Dulmes v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/04/11 None 07/07/10 10-CV-0559-RTR Ney v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/28/11 $7,500.00/IFP 07/08/10 10-CV-0565-WEC Schmidt v. Astrue Affirmed 09/20/11 N/A 07/13/10 10-CV-0582-LA S v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/18/11 $7,000.00/IFP 07/14/10 10-CV-0589-AEG Cook v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/30/10 $3,091.48/$350.00 07/14/10 10-CV-0592-RTR Knight v. Astrue Affirmed 06/07/11 N/A 07/15/10 10-CV-0595-JPS Loubriel v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/18/11 $3,917.25/IFP 07/16/10 10-CV-0599-JPS Tohl v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 09/01/11 $6,918.25/$366.62 07/19/10 10-CV-0603-JPS Kirkeeng v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/11/11 $18,734.97/$350.00 07/22/10 10-CV-0619-AEG Cueller v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/05/11 $1,684.98 07/26/10 10-CV-0632-JPS Nelson v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/08/10 None 07/26/10 10-CV-0635-RTR Jones v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 11/29/11 $5,000.00/$383.17 08/03/10 10-CV-0659-WEC Mandella v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/17/11 $3,850.00/IFP 08/06/10 10-CV-0671-LA Kastner v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/06/11 $4,500.00/IFP 08/10/10 10-CV-0679-LA Schill v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 02/22/11 $5,189.08/IFP 08/10/10 10-CV-0680-RTR Meeks v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/11/11 $7,416.97/IFP 08/11/10 10-CV-0682-LA Balde v. Astrue Affirmed 08/04/11 N/A 08/12/10 10-CV-0684-LA Hanson v. Astrue Affirmed 04/09/11 N/A 08/18/10 10-CV-0712-CNC Gray v. Astrue Affirmed 08/10/12 N/A 08/24/10 10-CV-0719-RTR Prescott v. Astrue Affirmed 05/10/11 N/A 08/23/10 10-CV-0722-PJG Potter v. Astrue Dismissed 02/16/11 IFP/Pro se 08/26/10 10-CV-0732-WCG Sweetalla v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/21/11 $5,078.09/IFP 08/26/10 10-CV-0733-JPS Brown v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 02/23/11 $3,100.00/IFP 09/01/10 10-CV-0754-RTR Scott v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/13/11 $8,555.08/IFP 09/10/10 10-CV-0780-JPS Washington v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 02/04/11 $4,553.78/IFP 09/17/10 10-CV-0806-WCG Haferbecker v. Astrue Affirmed 07/05/11 N/A 09/26/10 10-CV-0838-CNC Cameron v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/31/12 $6,845.50/IFP 09/27/10 10-CV-0839-RTR Nelson v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/02/11 $4,787.91/IFP 09/28/10 10-CV-0846-PJG Toles v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/01/11 $5,994.94/$350.00 09/30/10 10-CV-0856-CNC Bronnson v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/24/12 $7,733.88/$366.62 10/01/10 10-CV-0858-WCG Schultz v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/12/11 None 10/15/10 10-CV-0920-JPS Exum v. Astrue Affirmed 11/28/11 N/A 10/19/10 10-CV-0939-JPS Coppersmith v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 12/16/11 None 10/19/10 10-CV-0940-CNC Mathes v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/31/12 None 10/26/10 10-CV-0957-WEC Roberts v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/30/12 IFP/Pro se 10/27/10 10-CV-0965-WEC Smith v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/20/11 $1,200.00
10/31/10 10-CV-0973-AEG Lucas v. Astrue Affirmed 05/09/11 N/A 11/10/10 10-CV-1001-WCG Follett v. Astrue Remanded 03/28/12 $7,057.25/$350.00 11/10/10 10-CV-1002-LA Koepp v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/22/11 None 11/15/10 10-CV-1018-RTR Stachura v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/09/11 IFP/Pro se 11/15/10 10-CV-1020-CNC Nettesheim v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/14/12 $8,918.50/IFP (Motion Pending) 11/16/10 10-CV-1021-WEC Ford v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/05/12 $4,100.00/IFP 11/17/10 10-CV-1027-LA Cox v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/12/11 $5,604.84/IFP 11/18/10 10-CV-1028-AEG Staffaroni v. Astrue Affirmed 07/28/11 N/A 11/23/10 10-CV-1050-AEG Laabs v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/25/11 $6,788.05/IFP 11/24/10 10-CV-1056-WCG Reinke v. Astrue Affirmed 01/20/12 N/A 11/24/10 10-CV-1059-LA Minett v. Astrue Dismissed on Parties' Joint Motion 04/06/11 None 11/27/10 10-CV-1067-WCG Retlick v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/27/12 $7,921.75/$350.00 12/06/10 10-CV-1093-PJG Parker v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/02/11 None 12/10/10 10-CV-1116-WEC Stewart v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/30/12 $7,631.94/IFP 12/10/10 10-CV-1119-WCG Meiers-Petersen v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/30/12 $8,400.00/$350.00 12/13/10 10-CV-1122-WEC Johnstone v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 01/23/12 $5,634.00/IFP 12/17/10 10-CV-1138-WEC Rodriguez v. Astrue Affirmed 02/21/12 N/A 12/20/10 10-CV-1143-WEC Tucker v. Astrue Affirmed 08/06/12 N/A 12/20/10 10-CV-1145-LA Pfund v. Astrue Affirmed 08/26/11 N/A 12/22/10 10-CV-1152-LA Hoffman v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/27/11 $6,347.01/IFP 12/22/10 10-CV-1154-JPS Harris v. Astrue Affirmed 09/29/11 N/A 12/29/10 10-CV-1170-JPS Willis v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 01/25/12 $5,000.00/IFP 12/30/10 10-CV-1181-WCG Versteegh v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/23/11 $4,214.00/IFP
2011 Social Security Cases Date Case No./Judge Case Title Disposition Disp. Attorneys' Filed Date Fees/Costs 01/28/11 11-CV-0119-CNC Smith v. Astrue Voluntarily Dismissed 02/09/11 N/A 01/01/11 11-CV-0001-RTR Petrillo v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/14/11 $1,050.00/IFP 01/05/11 11-CV-0008-RTR Modjewski v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/12/11 $6,700.00/IFP 01/06/11 11-CV-0012-JPS Johnson v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 11/08/11 $5,612.74/IFP 03/14/11 01/11/11 11-CV-0026-JPS Hartman v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/07/12 $5,750.00/$350.00 01/12/11 11-CV-0029-JPS Rockwell v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 01/06/12 None 01/12/11 11-CV-0031-LA Rogers v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/29/11 $5,070.00/IFP 01/25/11 11-CV-0081-WEC McAlister v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/27/12 $2,400.00 02/03/11 11-CV-0128-RTR Majerus v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/18/11 $3,415.50/IFP 02/03/11 11-CV-0129-RTR Conrardy v. Astrue Affirmed 08/17/11 N/A 02/04/11 11-CV-0139-WCG Aulik v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/01/11 $4,616.62/$350.00 02/07/11 11-CV-0149-LA Berry v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/21/11 $4,620.00/$366.62 02/08/11 11-CV-0152-LA Roth v. Astrue Remanded 09/26/11 None 02/09/11 11-CV-0157-RTR Allen v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/13/11 $7,900.00/IFP 02/14/11 11-CV-0165-NJ Martinez v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 02/03/12 $1,500.00 02/14/11 11-CV-0168-WCG Everard v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/01/11 $3,552.50/$366.62 02/17/11 11-CV-0180-WCG Rodriguez v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/15/11 $5,000.00/IFP 02/22/11 11-CV-0196-RTR Schrank v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/29/11 None 02/25/11 11-CV-0212-LA Hayes v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/14/11 $7,450.00/IFP 03/01/11 11-CV-0224-WEC Mrstik v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 03/26/12 $7,700.00/$350.00 03/03/11 11-CV-0231-LA Hanke v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/24/11 $6,200.00/$533.54 03/02/11 11-CV-0235-JPS Allen v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 02/23/12 $6,683.38/IFP 03/04/11 11-CV-0243-PJG Kiefer v. Astrue Affirmed 03/27/12 N/A 03/09/11 11-CV-0248-CNC Smith v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/07/12 $4,900.00/$27.27 03/10/11 11-CV-0253-RTR Van Atta v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 11/16/11 $5,400.00/$350.00 03/15/11 11-CV-0263-WCG Roberts v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/16/11 $1,000.00/$366.62 03/17/11 11-CV-0271-RTR Fuentes v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/25/12 $7,144.61/IFP 03/18/11 11-CV-0275-JPS Westbrook v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 03/13/12 $7,493.31/IFP 03/18/11 11-CV-0276-WCG McCartney v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/29/12 $8,528.75/IFP 03/21/11 11-CV-0282-NJ Hefter v. Astrue Affirmed 09/30/12 N/A 03/23/11 11-CV-0289-WEC Houston v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/03/11 $4,480.00/IFP 03/28/11 11-CV-0306-JPS Rowe v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 02/10/12 $4,300.00/IFP 03/29/11 11-CV-0307-JPS Young v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 04/30/12 $4,900.00/$350.00 03/31/11 11-CV-0317-WCG Lockwood v. Commissioner Social Remanded 08/01/12 $7,500.00/IFP Security Administration 04/05/11 11-CV-0327-WEC Clayhiggs v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/08/11 $4,771.25/IFP 04/05/11 11-CV-0328-NJ Shavlik v. Astrue Affirmed 01/20/12 N/A 04/09/11 11-CV-0338-JPS Perez v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 04/25/12 $6,714.80/IFP
04/18/11 11-CV-0368-CNC Caraballo v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/21/12 $3,776.12/IFP 04/26/11 11-CV-0399-WCG Francart v. Astrue Affirmed 07/25/12 N/A 04/27/11 11-CV-0403-RTR Mata v. Astrue Voluntarily Dismissed 08/17/11 N/A 04/27/11 11-CV-0404-NJ Patterson v. Astrue Affirmed 09/11/12 N/A 04/28/11 11-CV-0410-WEC Goetsch v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/28/12 $4,750.00/$350.00 04/29/11 11-CV-0415-JPS Woods v. Astrue Affirmed 04/30/12 N/A 05/02/11 11-CV-0420-WEC Thibaudeau v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/13/12 $7,200.00/IFP 05/09/11 11-CV-0442-CNC Lunsford v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/21/12 Motion Pending 05/12/11 11-CV-0452-CNC Wieland v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/21/12 $7,500.00/IFP 05/17/11 11-CV-0471-PJG Towle v. Astrue Affirmed 10/22/12 N/A 05/20/11 11-CV-0487-RTR Bunting v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 02/08/12 $10,740.13/IFP 05/20/11 11-CV-0488-LA Smith v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/15/11 $5,700.00/IFP 05/21/11 11-CV-0494-CNC Beckard v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 09/16/11 None 05/24/11 11-CV-0495-CNC Tennant v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/28/12 IFP/Pro se 05/24/11 11-CV-0498-WEC Paavilainen v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 07/26/11 None 05/28/11 11-CV-0513-PJG Kramer v. Astrue Remanded 09/28/12 $7,500.00/IFP 06/02/11 11-CV-0530-NJ Valero v. Astrue Affirmed 09/30/12 N/A 06/02/11 11-CV-0532-PJG Kronberg v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/13/12 $5,200.00/IFP 06/08/11 11-CV-0552-NJ Anzalone v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/06/12 $5,200.00/$350.00 06/20/11 11-CV-0591-NJ Felske v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/01/12 $8,300.00/IFP 06/27/11 11-CV-0622-RTR Crooms v. Astrue Dismissed on Government's Motion 09/19/11 IFP/Pro se 06/28/11 11-CV-0627-PJG Orozco v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 02/22/12 $5,480.75/$350.00 07/01/11 11-CV-0639-CNC Wynn v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/28/12 $6,300.00/$350.00 07/01/11 11-CV-0640-NJ Spears v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 02/28/12 $4,000.00/IFP 07/06/11 11-CV-0649-WCG McAuley v. Astrue Remanded 09/25/12 $7,500.00/IFP 07/08/11 11-CV-0656-PJG Diaz v. Astrue Remanded 10/16/12 $4,900.00/IFP 07/11/11 11-CV-0659-CNC Ivy v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 05/31/12 $5,850.00/IFP 07/18/11 11-CV-0687-WEC Lehman v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/30/12 $6,411.81/IFP 07/20/11 11-CV-0692-JPS Nolan v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 04/23/12 $5,500.00/$350.00 08/01/11 11-CV-0729-WEC Khur v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/27/12 $8,331.22/$362.60 08/04/11 11-CV-0739-LA Hildebrandt v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/03/12 $5,300.00/IFP 08/05/11 11-CV-0741-WCG Farr v. Astrue Remanded 09/25/12 None 08/08/11 11-CV-0745-CNC Branch v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/27/12 $6,700.00/IFP 08/08/11 11-CV-0746-NJ Manske v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 09/19/11 None 08/09/11 11-CV-0749-LA Lindsley v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 05/03/12 None 08/10/11 11-CV-0756-LA Witek v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/16/12 $5,609.00/IFP 08/14/11 11-CV-0767-RTR Van Dyke v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/18/12 $5,740.00/IFP 08/16/11 11-CV-0771-WEC Minske v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 12/07/11 IFP/Pro se 08/16/11 11-CV-0773-JPS Roso v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 04/11/12 $9,500.00/IFP 08/18/11 11-CV-0783-JPS Henderson v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 02/27/12 $5,500.00/IFP
08/30/11 11-CV-0820-PJG Miller v. Astrue Remanded 08/22/12 $7,035.75/IFP 08/31/11 11-CV-0832-WCG DeGoey v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/13/12 $4,500.00/$350.00 09/01/11 11-CV-0833-RTR Williams v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/27/12 $6,358.08/IFP 09/02/11 11-CV-0841-NJ Bruce v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/13/12 $4,500.00/IFP 09/06/11 11-CV-0843-LA Nealy v. Social Security Voluntarily Dismissed 01/24/12 N/A Administration 09/09/11 11-CV-0854-CNC McDowell v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/19/12 $5,400.00/IFP 09/09/11 11-CV-0856-PJG Fermaint v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/15/12 $6,314.38/IFP 09/16/11 11-CV-0876-PJG Stapleton v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/11/12 None 09/19/11 11-CV-0877-LA Schomer v. Astrue, et. al. Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/10/12 $3,100.00/IFP 09/21/11 11-CV-0887-LA Washington v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 03/08/12 $5,513.41/IFP 09/23/11 11-CV-0896-LA Ramsey v. Astrue Dismissed 06/07/12 IFP/Pro se 09/26/11 11-CV-0900-RTR Ash v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/10/12 None 10/04/11 11-CV-0927-JPS Kazee v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 05/10/12 $7,034.00/IFP 10/11/11 11-CV-0946-CNC Neuman v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Stipulation 07/12/12 $5,824.31/IFP 10/11/11 11-CV-0951-RTR Devera v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 06/29/12 $4,565.48/$350.00 10/12/11 11-CV-0955-LA Phippen v. Astrue Affirmed 05/11/12 N/A 10/17/11 11-CV-0966-LA Rivera v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/01/12 $7,500.00/IFP 10/17/11 11-CV-0970-WCG Tapia v. Astrue Remanded 07/31/12 $5,000.00/IFP 10/18/11 11-CV-0971-WEC Roberts v. Social Security Reversed/Remanded 12/17/12 Pro se Administration 10/24/11 11-CV-0992-RTR Harvester v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/05/12 $7,740.00/IFP 10/24/11 11-CV-0994-PJG Faul v. Astrue Pending 10/25/11 11-CV-1001-PJG Pfennig v. Astrue Pending 10/31/11 11-CV-1012-WCG Martin v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 05/22/12 $4,000.00/IFP 10/31/11 11-CV-1015-LA Mason v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 05/25/12 $6,300.00/$350.00 11/10/11 11-CV-1035-JPS Andujal v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/28/12 $5,918.13/$350.00 11/10/11 11-CV-1037-NJ Sutter v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 09/10/12 $5,800.00 11/15/11 11-CV-1048-WEC Cadogan v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 10/12/12 $4,000.00/$350.00 11/17/11 11-CV-1063-LA Cain-Wesa v. Astrue Affirmed 06/13/12 N/A 11/25/11 11-CV-1083-WCG Warner v. Astrue Remanded 01/18/13 None 11/28/11 11-CV-1087-RTR Cerpa v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/05/12 $9,743.75/IFP 12/05/11 11-CV-1104-NJ Mydlowski v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 05/10/12 $2,926.50/IFP 12/07/11 11-CV-1110-PJG Jubelirer v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/04/12 $3,467.50 12/12/11 11-CV-1125-CNC Pickett v. Social Dismissed on Government's Motion 04/25/12 IFP/Pro se Security Office 12/16/11 11-CV-1141-RTR Zainer v. Astrue Remanded 01/23/13 None 12/19/11 11-CV-1143-NJ Alfano v. Astrue Voluntarily Dismissed 04/06/12 N/A 12/20/11 11-CV-1147-PJG Klasen v. Astrue Pending 12/20/11 11-CV-1151-RTR McIntire v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 07/10/12 $6,775.00/$350.00 12/23/11 11-CV-1162-JPS Van Epps v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 01/14/13 None 12/23/11 11-CV-1165-NJ Rodriguez v. Social Security Pending Administration 12/27/11 11-CV-1169-LA Rhodes v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 06/08/12 $4,398.25/IFP
12/29/11 11-CV-1177-CNC Johnson v. Astrue Pending
12/30/11 11-CV-1179-WCG Menge v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/12/12 $4,500.00/IFP
12/30/11 11-CV-1181-NJ Long v. Commissioner of Social Pending
Security
2012 Social Security Cases Date Disp. Attorneys' Filed Case No./Judge Case Title Disposition Date Fees/Costs 11/15/07 07-CV-1016-JPS McCollum v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 10/05/12 $11,000.00/IFP 05/18/12 05/05/08 08-CV-0386-CNC Chase v. Astrue Remanded by the Seventh Circuit 03/31/12 Motion Pending 03/23/12 01/13/12 12-CV-0046-LA Hunt v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 08/31/12 $4,514.25/$350.00 01/20/12 12-CV-0055-JPS Hilkert v. Astrue Affirmed 01/14/13 N/A 01/20/12 12-CV-0056-RTR Mareno v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 10/04/12 $3,564.28/$350.00 01/20/12 12-CV-0057-WCG Jorgensen v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 04/04/12 None 01/26/12 12-CV-0080-WCG Gerow v. Astrue Affirmed 01/17/13 N/A 01/27/12 12-CV-0087-NJ York v. Astrue Remanded on Government's Motion 05/09/12 None 01/27/12 12-CV-0089-PJG Parker v. Astrue Pending 02/01/12 12-CV-0108-WCG Pelnar v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/12/12 $3,609.16/IFP 02/02/12 12-CV-0113-LA Christiansen v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/02/12 $5,415.00/IFP 02/03/12 12-CV-0114-JPS Freismuth v. Astrue Remanded 01/31/13 02/06/12 12-CV-0124-RTR Gaber v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/04/12 None 02/07/12 12-CV-0132-WEC Lauer v. Astrue Affirmed 01/11/13 N/A 02/09/12 12-CV-0139-RTR Crittenden v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 07/30/12 $6,053.75/IFP 02/14/12 12-CV-0155-CNC Bufford v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/30/12 $7,500.00/IFP 02/15/12 12-CV-0157-WCG Niemi v. Astrue Pending 02/16/12 12-CV-0163-LA Kidder v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/13/12 $7,500.00/$377.00 02/16/12 12-CV-0166-WCG Jorgenson v. Astrue Remanded 01/23/13 None 02/27/12 12-CV-0201-WEC Black v. Astrue Affirmed 01/30/13 N/A 03/16/12 12-CV-0256-PJG Ross v. Astrue Pending 03/27/12 12-CV-0301-WCG Saunders v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 08/30/12 $4,200.00/IFP 03/29/12 12-CV-0312-RTR Lindsey v. Astrue Reversed/Remanded 12/04/12 None 03/29/12 12-CV-0313-JPS Wudtke v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/09/12 $5,566.25/IFP 04/04/12 12-CV-0326-WCG Senn v. Astrue Pending 04/09/12 12-CV-0340-WEC Schiller v. Astrue Pending 04/13/12 12-CV-0353-PJG Troop v. Astrue Pending 04/18/12 12-CV-0367-WCG Ford v. Astrue Pending 04/23/12 12-CV-0374-WCG Freeland v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/06/12 $6,650.00/$350.00 04/24/12 12-CV-0375-JPS Gayfield v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 11/09/12 None 04/25/12 12-CV-0382-LA McGee v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/28/12 $5,274.25/IFP 04/30/12 12-CV-0391-JPS Peterson v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 11/27/12 $350.00 (Costs Only) 04/30/12 12-CV-0395-CNC Pinson v. Astrue Pending 05/01/12 12-CV-0400-JPS Scott v. Astrue Pending 05/01/12 12-CV-0406-WEC Laux v. Astrue Pending 05/07/12 12-CV-0451-WCG Barbeau v. Astrue Pending 05/09/12 12-CV-0464-JPS Fulfer v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 11/09/12 Motion Pending
05/14/12 12-CV-0478-RTR Morrison v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/20/12 Motion Pending 05/17/12 12-CV-0492-JPS Sherod v. Astrue Pending 05/17/12 12-CV-0493-RTR Weston v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/04/12 $5,200.00/IFP 05/17/12 12-CV-0498-PJG Burdick v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 12/18/12 Motion Pending 05/18/12 12-CV-0502-CNC Seilheimer v. Astrue Pending 05/21/12 12-CV-0503-RTR Frater v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/02/13 Motion Pending 05/23/12 12-CV-0514-WEC Van Handel v. Astrue Pending 05/24/12 12-CV-0527-WEC Diggs v. Astrue Pending 05/25/12 12-CV-0535-CNC Thompson v. Astrue Pending 05/25/12 12-CV-0538-CNC Eason v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/24/13 None 06/01/12 12-CV-0548-RTR Clark v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/29/13 None 06/03/12 12-CV-0551-JPS Allen v. Astrue Pending 06/05/12 12-CV-0566-JPS Pendzik v. Astrue Pending 06/05/12 12-CV-0568-JPS Brown v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 12/11/12 None 06/06/12 12-CV-0572-WEC Ludwig v. Astrue Pending 06/08/12 12-CV-0581-WCG Bernier v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 09/18/12 $3,181.14/IFP 06/15/12 12-CV-0615-NJ Buhk v. Astrue Pending 06/19/12 12-CV-0627-LA Tenhove v. Astrue Pending 06/19/12 12-CV-0632-LA Wolfgram v. Astrue Affirmed 01/18/13 N/A 06/20/12 12-CV-0639-JPS Behrens v. Astrue Pending 06/22/12 12-CV-0646-RTR Garin v. Commissioner Social Pending Security Administration 06/22/12 12-CV-0649-RTR L v. Astrue Pending 06/25/12 12-CV-0653-RTR Dunbar v. Astrue Pending 06/28/12 12-CV-0663-RTR Payment v. Astrue Pending 06/29/12 12-CV-0671-NJ Jezwinski v. Astrue Pending 07/03/12 12-CV-0681-JPS Broughton v. Astrue Pending 07/05/12 12-CV-0682-JPS Cintron v. Social Security Dismissed on Government's Motion 12/11/12 IFP/Pro se Administration, et. al. Dotson v. Commissioner of Pending 07/05/12 12-CV-0685-LA Social Security 07/06/12 12-CV-0692-CNC Beamon v. Social Security Dismissed on Government's Motion 01/25/13 IFP/Pro se Administration 07/10/12 12-CV-0701-NJ Moss v. Astrue Pending 07/14/12 12-CV-0722-LA Mott v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 01/30/13 None 07/16/12 12-CV-0726-LA Zoephel v. Astrue Pending 07/17/12 12-CV-0733-JPS Arnold Simpson v. Astrue Vacated/Remanded 01/25/13 None 07/22/12 12-CV-0750-RTR Klingbeil v. Astrue Pending 07/24/12 12-CV-0761-PJG Lahmsen v. Astrue Pending 07/27/12 12-CV-0771-RTR Dufresne v. Astrue Pending 08/02/12 12-CV-0790-JPS Woods v. Office of Disability Pending Adjudication and Review 08/03/12 12-CV-0795-WEC Herrera v. Astrue Pending 08/06/12 12-CV-0799-JPS Wahls v. Astrue Pending 08/06/12 12-CV-0800-WEC Dill v. Astrue Pending
08/13/12 12-CV-0821-LA Brown v. Astrue Remanded on Parties' Joint Motion 10/29/12 $949.00/IFP 08/13/12 12-CV-0822-CNC Hanson v. Astrue Pending 08/16/12 12-CV-0834-WEC Resendez v. Astrue Pending 08/16/12 12-CV-0836-WCG Delaney v. Astrue Pending 08/18/12 12-CV-0842-RTR Kolp v. Astrue Pending 08/22/12 12-CV-0850-RTR Fenner v. Astrue Pending 08/29/12 12-CV-0872-NJ Hale v. Astrue Pending 09/07/12 12-CV-0917-JPS Grant v. Social Security Pending Administration 09/11/12 12-CV-0926-RTR Schmidt v. Astrue Pending 09/18/12 12-CV-0956-RTR Webster v. Astrue Pending 09/18/12 12-CV-0957-RTR Smith v. Astrue Pending 09/19/12 12-CV-0958-LA Daniels v. Astrue Pending 09/20/12 12-CV-0967-RTR Savignac v. Astrue Pending 09/21/12 12-CV-0969-LA Schurr v. Astrue Pending 09/25/12 12-CV-0976-NJ Swinney v. Astrue Pending 09/25/12 12-CV-0981-NJ Weckwerth v. Astrue Pending 10/04/12 12-CV-1008-NJ Jemison v. Astrue Pending 10/11/12 12-CV-1044-JPS Warr v. Astrue Pending 10/16/12 12-CV-1055-PJG Sterken v. Astrue Pending 10/22/12 12-CV-1072-WCG Parini v. Astrue Pending 10/23/12 12-CV-1079-AEG Watts v. Astrue Pending 10/24/12 12-CV-1080-CNC Turner v. Astrue Pending 10/28/12 12-CV-1090-NJ Berry v. Astrue Pending 10/29/12 12-CV-1092-AEG Farrell v. Astrue Pending 10/31/12 12-CV-1102-WCG Varga v. Astrue Pending 10/31/12 12-CV-1104-JPS Repinski-Engle v. Astrue Pending 10/31/12 12-CV-1106-PJG Rosenberg v. Astrue Pending 11/01/12 12-CV-1114-AEG Heichler v. Astrue Pending 11/02/12 12-CV-1118-WCG Gancarcik v. Astrue Pending 11/04/12 12-CV-1121-RTR Paulsen v. Astrue Pending 11/06/12 12-CV-1130-WCG Thompson v. Astrue Pending 11/06/12 12-CV-1131-LA Stenger v. Astrue Pending 11/13/12 12-CV-1153-PJG Piggue v. Astrue Pending 11/14/12 12-CV-1159-RTR Rudolph v. Commissioner of Pending Social Security 11/14/12 12-CV-1163-AEG Rutledge v. Commissioner Pending Social Security Administration 11/16/12 12-CV-1169-WEC Clayton v. Commissioner of Pending Social Security 11/21/12 12-CV-1185-JPS Crowell v. Astrue Pending 11/26/12 12-CV-1192-WEC Schuessler v. Astrue Pending 11/27/12 12-CV-1196-JPS Salazar v. Astrue Pending 11/27/12 12-CV-1199-RTR Whitt v. Astrue Pending
11/28/12 12-CV-1203-AEG Brandt v. Commissioner of Pending Social Security 11/29/12 12-CV-1206-WCG Cantu v. Astrue Pending 11/29/12 12-CV-1209-RTR Goodwin v. Astrue Pending 11/30/12 12-CV-1216-PJG Vich v. Astrue Pending 12/01/12 12-CV-1219-LA Cirino v. Astrue Pending 12/03/12 12-CV-1221-AEG Shoffner v. Astrue Pending 12/03/12 12-CV-1225-AEG Evans v. Astrue Pending 12/05/12 12-CV-1238-PJG Reichardt v. Astrue Pending 12/05/12 12-CV-1239-LA Stockton v. Astrue Pending 12/07/12 12-CV-1252-WCG McDaniel v. Astrue Pending 12/12/12 12-CV-1269-AEG Hart v. Astrue Pending 12/12/12 12-CV-1271-AEG Schrage v. Astrue Pending 12/14/12 12-CV-1275-WCG Van Den Bloomer v. Astrue Pending 12/14/12 12-CV-1276-LA Johnson v. Astrue Pending 12/18/12 12-CV-1285-RTR McKinney v. Astrue Pending 12/20/12 12-CV-1299-WCG Suchocki v. Astrue, et. al. Pending 12/21/12 12-CV-1302-NJ Filczer v. Astrue Pending 12/27/12 12-CV-1311-AEG Loomis v. Astrue Pending
2013 Social Security Cases
Date Disp. Attorneys'
Filed Case No./Judge Case Title Disposition Date Fees/Costs
01/02/13 13-CV-0002-JPS Gomez v. Social Security Office of Pending
Disability Adjudication and Review
01/04/13 13-CV-0014-AEG Jones v. Social Security
Administration Pending
01/07/13 13-CV-0015-LA Olson v. Astrue Pending
01/08/13 13-CV-0024-AEG Neuberger v. Astrue Pending
01/09/13 13-CV-0029-JPS Williams v. Astrue Pending
01/09/13 13-CV-0030-JPS Triggs v. Astrue Pending
01/10/13 13-CV-0033-WCG Stamper v. Astrue Pending
01/15/13 13-CV-0056-JPS Serbian v. Astrue Pending
01/17/13 13-CV-0064-JPS Nash v. Astrue Pending
01/22/13 13-CV-0075-JPS Kujac v. Astrue Pending
01/22/13 13-CV-0076-JPS Thompson v. Astrue Pending
01/25/13 13-CV-0096-RTR Crammers v. Astrue Pending
01/25/13 13-CV-0101-JPS Evans v. Astrue Pending
01/28/13 13-CV-0104-AEG Carr v. Astrue Pending
01/29/13 13-CV-0107-WCG Kaczrowski v. Astrue Pending
01/30/13 13-CV-0110-LA Andino Ruiz v. Astrue Pending
01/31/13 13-CV-0112-LA Grasso v. Astrue Pending
