U.S. v. ADENT, 12-C-1286. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20150609b07
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2015
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its claim for lien foreclosure against Leonard, Joyce, and Derek Adent. This motion must be denied because it fails to comply with Civil Local Rule 56(a) (E.D. Wis.), which provides specific procedures for summary judgment motions against pro se litigants. The motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 31] is DENIED. The United States can renew its motio
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its claim for lien foreclosure against Leonard, Joyce, and Derek Adent. This motion must be denied because it fails to comply with Civil Local Rule 56(a) (E.D. Wis.), which provides specific procedures for summary judgment motions against pro se litigants. The motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 31] is DENIED. The United States can renew its motion..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its claim for lien foreclosure against Leonard, Joyce, and Derek Adent. This motion must be denied because it fails to comply with Civil Local Rule 56(a) (E.D. Wis.), which provides specific procedures for summary judgment motions against pro se litigants.
The motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 31] is DENIED. The United States can renew its motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If no motion is filed, this matter will be set for a trial to the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
