RICOH COMPANY, LTD. v. QUANTA COMPUTER, INC., 06-cv-462-bbc. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20150928434
Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB , District Judge . In an order dated July 30, 2015, I directed the parties to show cause why all the filings in this case should not be unsealed. Dkt. #557. In response, plaintiff has submitted a list of documents that it believes should remain sealed. Dkt. #560. All of these are confidential license agreements or settlement agreements that plaintiff says were not introduced at trial or part of any decision by the court. Under these circumstances, I am persuaded that
Summary: ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB , District Judge . In an order dated July 30, 2015, I directed the parties to show cause why all the filings in this case should not be unsealed. Dkt. #557. In response, plaintiff has submitted a list of documents that it believes should remain sealed. Dkt. #560. All of these are confidential license agreements or settlement agreements that plaintiff says were not introduced at trial or part of any decision by the court. Under these circumstances, I am persuaded that t..
More
ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In an order dated July 30, 2015, I directed the parties to show cause why all the filings in this case should not be unsealed. Dkt. #557. In response, plaintiff has submitted a list of documents that it believes should remain sealed. Dkt. #560. All of these are confidential license agreements or settlement agreements that plaintiff says were not introduced at trial or part of any decision by the court. Under these circumstances, I am persuaded that the documents may remain sealed. Accordingly, the clerk of court is directed to keep the documents listed in docket no. 560 sealed. The clerk is directed to UNSEAL all other sealed documents filed by the parties.
Source: Leagle
