BOYER v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, 14-cv-147-wmc (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20160212c80
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . The court having been advised by counsel that all claims against defendant 3M have been settled ( e.g., `286 dkt. #462), these claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, but may be renewed upon good cause shown. If the parties wish to dismiss with prejudice, they may have until May 11, 2016, to file a self-executing motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 or a proposed order. In addition, the pending motions involving defe
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . The court having been advised by counsel that all claims against defendant 3M have been settled ( e.g., `286 dkt. #462), these claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, but may be renewed upon good cause shown. If the parties wish to dismiss with prejudice, they may have until May 11, 2016, to file a self-executing motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 or a proposed order. In addition, the pending motions involving defen..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
The court having been advised by counsel that all claims against defendant 3M have been settled (e.g., `286 dkt. #462), these claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, but may be renewed upon good cause shown. If the parties wish to dismiss with prejudice, they may have until May 11, 2016, to file a self-executing motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 or a proposed order.
In addition, the pending motions involving defendant 3M are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT:
1) Defendant 3M Company's motions for summary judgment (`286 dkt. #210; `186 dkt. #210; `147 dkt. #187; `219 dkt. #237);
2) Defendant 3M Company's motions "to exclude unreliable plaintiffs' expert opinions that every exposure to asbestos causes disease" (`286 dkt. #303; `186 dkt. #304; `147 dkt. #269; `219 dkt. #327);
3) Plaintiffs' unopposed motions to file sur-reply declarations of expert James Johnson (`286 dkt. #414; `186 dkt. #422; `147 dkt. #372; `219 dkt. #428); and
4) Defendant's motion for protective order and motion for leave to file reply in support of motion for protective order (`286 dkt. ##421, 428; `186 dkt. ##429, 436; `147 dkt. ##379, 386; `219 dkt. ##435, 443).
Finally, the court will strike all pretrial deadlines and the trial date for all claims involving defendant 3M only. Should these claims be renewed, the pending motions, remaining schedule and trial will be taken up on an expedited basis.
Source: Leagle
