EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED, 14-cv-748-wmc. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20160404d46
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . Having reviewed plaintiff's amended deposition designations (dkt. #745) and defendants' amended objections and counter-designations (dkt. #764), the court makes the following rulings as to witness: David Jones. The approved designations may be presented to the jury unless the witness is available to testify in person. Plaintiff shall remove all objections and any other asides or discussions between counsel and/or with the court reporter, even wher
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . Having reviewed plaintiff's amended deposition designations (dkt. #745) and defendants' amended objections and counter-designations (dkt. #764), the court makes the following rulings as to witness: David Jones. The approved designations may be presented to the jury unless the witness is available to testify in person. Plaintiff shall remove all objections and any other asides or discussions between counsel and/or with the court reporter, even where..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
Having reviewed plaintiff's amended deposition designations (dkt. #745) and defendants' amended objections and counter-designations (dkt. #764), the court makes the following rulings as to witness: David Jones. The approved designations may be presented to the jury unless the witness is available to testify in person. Plaintiff shall remove all objections and any other asides or discussions between counsel and/or with the court reporter, even where not noted by the court in its rulings.
DAVID G. JONES
(September 22, 2015)
Plaintiff's Plaintiff's Defendants' Defendants' Plaintiff's Rulings
Designations Amended Objections Counter- Objections
Designations Designations to Counter-
Designations
35:13-37:9 Retained as 35:25-36:3 This Overruled as
to 35:13-36:22 testimony to 35:25-36:3;
should be struck sustained as
pursuant to to 36:18-21
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
36:5-8 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
36:18-21 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
39:11-40:9 Retained as 39:19-40:4 This Overruled
to 39:19-40:9 testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
40:11-41:8 Retained as 40:20-41:2 This Overruled
to 40:11-13, testimony
40:20-41:8 should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
43:11-44:1 Retained 43:11-25 This Overruled as
testimony to 43:11-12;
should be struck sustained as
pursuant to to 43:13-44:1
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
44:9-47:25 Retained 45:1-2 This Overruled at
testimony to 45-46;
should be struck sustained as
pursuant to to 47
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
45:4-11 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
45:13-17 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
45:25-46:4 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
46:6-10 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
47:1-4 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
47:6-10 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
47:12-19 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
48:2-49:4 Retained 48:5-13 This Sustained
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
49:6-51:11 Retained 49:11-16 This Overruled as
testimony to 49:11-16;
should be struck sustained as
pursuant to to 49:21-50:3,
Rule 403 50:5-11,
because it is 50:18-21,
needlessly 50:23-51:4
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
49:21-50:3 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
50:5-11 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
50:18-21 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
50:23-51:4 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exh. 4A)
55:24-58:3 Retained as 57: 3-5 This Overruled
to 56:9-10, testimony
56:16-58:3 should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
57:7-12 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
57:17-19 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
57:21-23 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
60:1-8 Retained 60:1-4 This Overruled
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
60:10-61:15 Retained Relevance. Overruled
60:14-18 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
60:23-61:1 This
testimony
should be struck
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
61:21-62:6 Retained Relevance; Sustained
cumulative
62:8-63:9 Retained Relevance; Sustained
cumulative
63:22-64:5 Retained Relevance; Sustained
cumulative
64:11-25 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
65:9-66:6 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
66:9-67:14 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
70:18-72:13 Retained Relevance; Overruled as
cumulative to 70:18-
71:13-18 This 71:25;
testimony sustained as
should be struck to 72:1-13
pursuant to
Rule 403
because it is
needlessly
presenting
cumulative
evidence.
(Reading from
Exhibit)
73:9-21 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
73:23-75:2 Retained as Relevance; Overruled
to 73:23-74:11 cumulative
75:22-76:18 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
77:11-23 Retained Relevance; Overruled as
cumulative to 77:11-17;
sustained as
to 77:18-23
78:1-82:24 Retained as Relevance; Sustained as
to 78:1-12, cumulative to 78:1-3;
79:9-82:24 overruled as
to 78:5-12
83:14-21 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
84:4-86:3 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
86:10-88:16 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
88:21-25 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
99:25-100:18 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
106:15-107:16 Retained Relevance; Overruled
cumulative
Source: Leagle
