SEDLAK v. TREBON & MAYHEW, 15-C-567. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20160628g89
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2016
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA , District Judge . The plaintiffs move to reconsider the Court's ruling that this matter is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). To prevail on their motion, the plaintiffs must "clearly establish" that the Court committed a manifest error of law or fact, or that newly discovered evidence precluded entry of judgment. Blue v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 698 F.3d 587 , 598 (7th Cir. 2012). The plaintiffs did neither. Accordin
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA , District Judge . The plaintiffs move to reconsider the Court's ruling that this matter is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). To prevail on their motion, the plaintiffs must "clearly establish" that the Court committed a manifest error of law or fact, or that newly discovered evidence precluded entry of judgment. Blue v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 698 F.3d 587 , 598 (7th Cir. 2012). The plaintiffs did neither. According..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.
The plaintiffs move to reconsider the Court's ruling that this matter is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). To prevail on their motion, the plaintiffs must "clearly establish" that the Court committed a manifest error of law or fact, or that newly discovered evidence precluded entry of judgment. Blue v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 698 F.3d 587, 598 (7th Cir. 2012). The plaintiffs did neither. Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion [ECF No. 60] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
