RUDI v. COLVIN, 16-cv-51-jdp. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20160909c61
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive ..
More
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
