THE JOHN K. MacIVER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY, INC. v. SCHMITZ, 16-cv-539-wmc. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20170105d78
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . A telephonic hearing was held today in the above-captioned matter, at which the parties appeared by counsel. This order memorializes the rulings the court made during that hearing. ORDER IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. By January 13, 2017, defendants shall file a response to the five categories of discovery plaintiff seeks on page eight of its brief in opposition to defendants' motion to stay discovery (dkt. #80), indicating specifically: (1) which defen
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . A telephonic hearing was held today in the above-captioned matter, at which the parties appeared by counsel. This order memorializes the rulings the court made during that hearing. ORDER IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. By January 13, 2017, defendants shall file a response to the five categories of discovery plaintiff seeks on page eight of its brief in opposition to defendants' motion to stay discovery (dkt. #80), indicating specifically: (1) which defend..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
A telephonic hearing was held today in the above-captioned matter, at which the parties appeared by counsel. This order memorializes the rulings the court made during that hearing.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. By January 13, 2017, defendants shall file a response to the five categories of discovery plaintiff seeks on page eight of its brief in opposition to defendants' motion to stay discovery (dkt. #80), indicating specifically: (1) which defendants, if any, are in possession or control of the documents requested (or the referenced, underlying documents from which a description or index is requested) as described in the first four categories, and if so, what information is in that defendant's possession or control; and (2) defendants' plans as to the fifth category.
2. All discovery is stayed until January 20, 2017, pending further order of the court.
3. Plaintiff may have until January 13, 2017, to file a limited brief addressing any new argument as to the specific questions posed by the court with regard to the meaning of "court warrant" and "legislative authorization" under the good faith defense in the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2707(e)(1). There shall be no response absent advance leave of the court.
4. Barring an earlier ruling by the court, an in-person hearing on defendants' motions to dismiss (dkt. ##65, 68) will be held on March 22, 2017, at 1:00 p.m.
Source: Leagle
