welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
  4. 2017
  5. U.S. v. Spectrum Brands, Inc., 15-cv-371-wmc. (2017)

U.S. v. Spectrum Brands, Inc., 15-cv-371-wmc. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20170224c55 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY , District Judge . The court rules as follows on the objections to deposition designations. PETER TAUBE Government's Spectrum's Objections Court Ruling Designations 19:22 — 20:6 — Objection — SUSTAINED 18:23 — 20:6 Irrelevant, Lack of personal knowledge Objection — mischaracterizes OVERRULED as to 29:8-23, 29:8 — 30:3 testimony, Lack of Foundation, otherwise Lack of personal Knowledge,
More

ORDER

The court rules as follows on the objections to deposition designations.

PETER TAUBE

Government's Spectrum's Objections Court Ruling Designations 19:22 — 20:6 — Objection — SUSTAINED 18:23 — 20:6 Irrelevant, Lack of personal knowledge Objection — mischaracterizes OVERRULED as to 29:8-23, 29:8 — 30:3 testimony, Lack of Foundation, otherwise Lack of personal Knowledge, SUSTAINED Speculation 35:9:21 Objection — Lack of Foundation OVERRULED 108:17 — 110:7 Objection — Hearsay OVERRULED 147:10 — 147:20 — Objection — SUSTAINED 147:10-24 Hearsay, Lack of Foundation, Speculation, Lack of Personal Knowledge

STUART SLUGH

25:9-25:25: Objection, see SUSTAINED to the Spectrum Brand's Motion in extent calls for legal 25:9-25 Limine No. 6, incorporated by conclusion; reference. OVERRULED as to the witness's understanding 50:9-23 — Objection — SUSTAINED as to 50:9-14, 50:9 — 51:11 Irrelevant, lack of personal OVERRULED as to knowledge 50:15-23 59:3-6 Objection — OVERRULED 57:3 — 59:14 Mischaracterizes testimony 67:7-23; 68:22 — 69:11 — OVERRULED except to Objection — Hearsay, lack of the truth of the matter foundation, lack of personal asserted knowledge, see Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay 66:2 — 69:11 evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 71:15 — 73:5 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 69:12 — 73:5 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 74:20-21 — Objection — OVERRULED except to 73:17 — 74:21 Mischaracterizes testimony the truth of the matter asserted No objection to remainder 76:25 — 77:17 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 75:21 — 78:8 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 88:4-14 — Objection — Hearsay, OVERRULED except to lack of foundation, lack of the truth of the matter personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 86:18 — 88:14 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 89:10-23 — Objection — Hearsay, OVERRULED except to lack of foundation, lack of the truth of the matter personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 88:18 — 89:23 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 90:3 — 91:3 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 90:3-91:7 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder Objection — Hearsay, lack of OVERRULED except to foundation, lack of personal the truth of the matter knowledge, see Motion in asserted 95:1 — 98:6 Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. 108:14 — 109:10 — Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter 108:14 — 109:17 lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 109:20 — 110:6 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 109:20 — 110:6 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 115:5-15; 116:16-21 — OVERRULED except to Objection — Hearsay, lack of the truth of the matter foundation, lack of personal asserted knowledge, see Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay 115:5 — 117:17 evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 121:2 — 122:17 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 120:8 — 122:17 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 125:11 — 126:3 — Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted 124:21 — 126:3 Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 132:3 — 133:2 Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 131:5 — 133:22 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 137:21 — 138:12; 138:21 — OVERRULED except to 139:5 — Objection — Hearsay, the truth of the matter lack of foundation, lack of asserted personal knowledge, see Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 137:2 — 139:14 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 141:18 — 142:8 — Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 140:23 — 142:24 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 154:16 — 155:5; 156:12-14 — OVERRULED except to Objection — Hearsay, lack of the truth of the matter foundation, lack of personal asserted knowledge, speculation; see 153:22-156:14 Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 156:22 — 157:7 Objection — Hearsay, lack of OVERRULED except to foundation, lack of personal knowledge, speculation; see the truth of the matter Motion in Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained asserted within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. 158:5-19 — Objection — Hearsay, OVERRULED except to lack of foundation, lack of the truth of the matter personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 157:11 — 158:19 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 161:23 — 162:9 — Objection — OVERRULED except to Hearsay, lack of foundation, the truth of the matter lack of personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 161:11 — 163:15 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder 164:8-22 — Objection — Hearsay, OVERRULED except to lack of foundation, lack of the truth of the matter personal knowledge, see asserted Motion in Limine #2 to exclude 163:16 — 165:6 hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. No objection to remainder Objection — Hearsay, lack of OVERRULED except to foundation, lack of personal the truth of the matter knowledge, see Motion in asserted 166:5 — 168:24 Limine #2 to exclude hearsay evidence contained within consumer incident reports incorporated herein by reference. 168:6-16 — Objection — OVERRULED except to Irrelevant the truth of the matter asserted
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
15-cv-371-wmc.
Counsels
  • Alan Phelps
  • Monica Christine Groat
  • Thomas Edward Ross
  • Timothy Leffard Mullin, Jr.
  • Eric J. Wilson
  • Erika Ziebarth Jones
  • Jennifer Lynn Gregor
  • Kevin James Penhallegon
  • Mark Warren Hancock
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer