Goldamer v. Berryhill, 17-cv-00768-jdp. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20180321796
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON , Chief District Judge . This cause coming before the Court on the stipulation of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, it is hereby ordered that: This matter shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon receipt of the Court's order, the Appeals Council will remand to an Administrative Law Judge w
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON , Chief District Judge . This cause coming before the Court on the stipulation of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, it is hereby ordered that: This matter shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon receipt of the Court's order, the Appeals Council will remand to an Administrative Law Judge wi..
More
ORDER
JAMES D. PETERSON, Chief District Judge.
This cause coming before the Court on the stipulation of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, it is hereby ordered that:
This matter shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon receipt of the Court's order, the Appeals Council will remand to an Administrative Law Judge with instructions to proceed through the sequential evaluation process as needed to reach a new decision; if the evaluation reaches step four, reconsider Plaintiff's residual functional capacity; if warranted, obtain additional vocational expert testimony; and issue a de novo decision.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
