Le Bleu Corporation v. Federal Mfg. LLC, 17-C-0549. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20180321h23
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER LYNN ADELMAN , District Judge . On March 13, 2018, plaintiff Le Bleu Corporation filed a motion to compel discovery. However, contrary to the court's scheduling order, see ECF No. 27, the plaintiff did not file the motion under Civil Local Rule 7(h). For this reason, I will strike the motion and all supporting materials. The plaintiff's motion to restrict one document filed in support of the motion will be denied as moot, as the document has been stricken. If the plaintiff intends
Summary: ORDER LYNN ADELMAN , District Judge . On March 13, 2018, plaintiff Le Bleu Corporation filed a motion to compel discovery. However, contrary to the court's scheduling order, see ECF No. 27, the plaintiff did not file the motion under Civil Local Rule 7(h). For this reason, I will strike the motion and all supporting materials. The plaintiff's motion to restrict one document filed in support of the motion will be denied as moot, as the document has been stricken. If the plaintiff intends t..
More
ORDER
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
On March 13, 2018, plaintiff Le Bleu Corporation filed a motion to compel discovery. However, contrary to the court's scheduling order, see ECF No. 27, the plaintiff did not file the motion under Civil Local Rule 7(h). For this reason, I will strike the motion and all supporting materials. The plaintiff's motion to restrict one document filed in support of the motion will be denied as moot, as the document has been stricken. If the plaintiff intends to rely on the sealed document in any future motion, it must re-file it and file a fresh motion to seal the document. The court reminds the parties to comply with its procedures regarding motions to seal. See ECF No. 42.
For the reasons stated, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion to strike (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 43) is STRICKEN.
FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to restrict (ECF No. 46) is DENIED as MOOT.
Source: Leagle
