Erickson v. Berryhill, 3:17-cv-804-jdp. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20180406g66
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive ..
More
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgm ent under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Sh.alala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) will reconsider the opinions of Roland R. More, M.D. and Ursula Berger, MSSW, LCSW. The ALJ will reconsider Plaintiff's allegations, consistent with applicable regulations rules and regulations, and reevaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity. If necessary, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to assist in reaching findings at steps four and/or five. The ALJ shall issue a de novo decision consistent with all applicable rules and regulations.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
