McDannel v. Berryhill, 17-cv-1504-pp. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20180425g28
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO.17), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On April 24, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 17. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that: The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO.17), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On April 24, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 17. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that: The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will i..
More
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO.17), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. §405(g)
PAMELA PEPPER, District Judge.
On April 24, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Dkt. No. 17. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that:
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will instruct an Administrative Law Judge to further evaluate the claimant's impairments at Step 3 to determine whether they meet or equal any listed impairment. If necessary, the case will be sent to an ALJ for a new administrative hearing at which the plaintiff will be afforded the opportunity to testify, submit additional evidence, and make arguments, and the ALJ will issue a new decision that complies with all governing regulations, including those governing subjective symptom analysis, consideration of medical opinions, and determination of residual functional capacity.
Source: Leagle
